IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/accafc/cca_213_0119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Coûts historiques vs. justes valeurs pour mesurer le résultat comptable ? Les arguments comparés des professionnels du chiffre

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Giordano-Spring
  • Isabelle Martinez
  • Olivier Vidal

Abstract

In its 2011 call for projects, the French accounting standard setters evoked the need to rehabilitate the income statement by excluding unrealized gains (the income statement approach), thus taking the opposite view from the concept developed by the IASB (the balance sheet approach). The objective of the paper is to respond to this call by making an attempt to understand the reasons provided by professional accountants to include or exclude unrealized gains in the comprehensive income. What are the arguments in favor of a ?monist? approach (based on historical cost) or those in favor of a ?dualist? approach (based on fair value) ? We conduct a qualitative study using 31 semi-structured interviews and carrying out two content analyses ? lexical and thematic. Results first show that there is no clear spilt between financial statement users and preparers in terms of language and concerns. Second, historical cost and fair value are not considered features of opposite accounting models, but rather complementary in today?s business environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Giordano-Spring & Isabelle Martinez & Olivier Vidal, 2015. "Coûts historiques vs. justes valeurs pour mesurer le résultat comptable ? Les arguments comparés des professionnels du chiffre," ACCRA, Association francophone de comptabilité, vol. 21(3), pages 119-148.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:accafc:cca_213_0119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=CCA_213_0119
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-comptabilite-controle-audit-2015-3-page-119.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:accafc:cca_213_0119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-accra.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.