IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v62y2017i3id53-2016-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of the effects of nefopam and tramadol on postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy

Author

Listed:
  • S. Zhang

    (College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China)

  • J.N. Li

    (College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China)

  • L. Luan

    (College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China)

  • W. Guan

    (College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China)

  • X.Y. Hu

    (College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China)

  • H.G. Fan

Abstract

Relieving perioperative pain can reduce postoperative suffering and improve recovery from anaesthesia in animals. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of nefopam and tramadol in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Twenty-four adult mixed-breed female dogs were randomly divided into three groups (n = 8) and received their respective treatments immediately after surgery: Group T (2 mg/kg tramadol, i.v.), Group C (1 mg/kg nefopam, i.v.) and Group D (2 mg/kg nefopam, i.v.). The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate (RR) and rectal temperature (RT) were measured and the level of analgesia was assessed using the Glasgow Composite Measure Pain Scale (CMPS-SF). The CMPS-SF was performed at least two days before premedication (baseline), every 2 h for the first 8 h (post-extubation), at 12 h and at 24 h. Results showed that the HR in all groups was significantly (P < 0.05) higher at 2 and 6 h than at baseline. The RR in Group T was significantly higher (P < 0.05) at 0 and 2 h than at baseline. Rescue analgesia (0.2 mg/kg morphine, i.v.) was provided if CMPS-SF pain scores greater than or equal to six. Four dogs required rescue analgesia: one dog in Group T at 2 h and three dogs in Group C at 2 and 6 h. No dogs in Group D required rescue analgesia. The CMPS-SF pain scores of dogs in Group C were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those in Group T at 6, 8 and 12 h. The scores in Group D were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than those in Group C at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12 h. The scores in Group D were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than those in Group T at 2 and 4 h. However, the scores in Group D were not significantly different compared with Group T. In conclusion, this study suggests that nefopam at 2 mg/kg i.v. produces better postoperative analgesia compared with tramadol at 2 mg/kg i.v. or nefopam at 1 mg/kg i.v. in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Zhang & J.N. Li & L. Luan & W. Guan & X.Y. Hu & H.G. Fan, 2017. "Comparison of the effects of nefopam and tramadol on postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(3), pages 131-137.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:62:y:2017:i:3:id:53-2016-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/53/2016-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/53/2016-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/53/2016-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/53/2016-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. X.Y. Hu & L. Luan & W. Guan & J. Shi & Y.B. Zhao & H.G. Fan, 2017. "Tolfenamic acid and meloxicam both provide an adequate degree of postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(6), pages 333-341.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:62:y:2017:i:3:id:53-2016-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.