IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlswr/v10y2015i3id16-2015-swr.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choosing an appropriate hydrological model for rainfall-runoff extremes in small catchments

Author

Listed:
  • Pavel Kovář

    (Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Michaela Hrabalíková

    (Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Martin Neruda

    (Faculty of Environment, University of Jan Evangelista Purkyně in Ústí nad Labem, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic)

  • Roman Neruda

    (Institute of Computer Science, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Šrejber

    (Czech Hydrometeorological Institute, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic)

  • Andrea Jelínková

    (Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Hana Bačinová

    (Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Real and scenario prognosis in engineering hydrology often involves using simulation techniques of mathematical modelling the rainfall-runoff processes in small catchments. These catchments are often up to 50 km2 in area, their character is torrential, and the type of water flow is super-critical. Many of them are ungauged. The damage in the catchments is enormous, and the length of the torrents is about 23% of the total length of small rivers in the Czech Republic. The Smědá experimental mountainous catchment (with the Bílý potok downstream gauge) in the Jizerské hory Mts. was chosen as a model area for simulating extreme rainfall-runoff processes using two different models. For the purposes of evaluating and simulating significant rainfall-runoff episodes, we chose the KINFIL physically-based 2D hydrological model, and ANN, an artificial neural network mathematical "learning" model. A neural network is a model of the non-linear functional dependence between inputs and outputs with free parameters (weights), which are created by iterative gradient learning algorithms utilizing calibration data. The two models are entirely different. They are based on different principles, but both require the same time series (rainfall-runoff) data. However, the parameters of the models are fully different, without any physical comparison. The strength of KINFIL is that there are physically clear parameters corresponding to adequate hydrological process equations, while the strength of ANN lies in the "learning procedure". Their common property is the rule that the greater the number of measured rainfall-runoff events (pairs), the better fitted the simulation results can be expected.

Suggested Citation

  • Pavel Kovář & Michaela Hrabalíková & Martin Neruda & Roman Neruda & Jan Šrejber & Andrea Jelínková & Hana Bačinová, 2015. "Choosing an appropriate hydrological model for rainfall-runoff extremes in small catchments," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 10(3), pages 137-146.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:10:y:2015:i:3:id:16-2015-swr
    DOI: 10.17221/16/2015-SWR
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/16/2015-SWR.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://swr.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/16/2015-SWR.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/16/2015-SWR?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rostislav Fiala & Jana Podhrázská & Jana Konečná & Josef Kučera & Petr Karásek & Pavel Zahradníček & Petr Štěpánek, 2020. "Changes in a river's regime of a watercourse after a small water reservoir construction," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 15(1), pages 55-65.
    2. Andrzej WALEGA & Leszek KSIAZEK, 2016. "Influence of rainfall data on the uncertainty of flood simulation," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 11(4), pages 277-284.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlswr:v:10:y:2015:i:3:id:16-2015-swr. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.