IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlrae/v63y2017i4id4-2016-rae.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of tine, wing, operating depth and speed on the draft requirement of subsoil tillage tines

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Askari
  • Gholamhossein Shahgholi

    (Department of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran)

  • Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh

    (Department of Agricultural Machinery, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran)

Abstract

In this study, the effect of tine type, adding wing, operating depth and forward speed on the draft requirement of subsoil tillage tines was investigated in clay loam soil. Three subsoil tillage tines (subsoiler, bentleg and paraplow), four levels of forward speed (1.8, 2.3, 2.9 and 3.5 km/h), three levels of depth (30, 40 and 50 cm) and winged and no-wing tines were examined with the exception of bentleg as it would not be winged. It was revealed that draft of the tines is less affected by forward speed but is much affected by tine type, depth and wing. It was observed that an increase of speed and depth plus adding wing results in an increase of draft in all tines. Additionally, it was found that in all depths and speeds, subsoiler required more draft than paraplow and paraplow required more draft than bentleg. Multiple regression models including the studied parameters were developed to predict the draft requirements for each tine with high accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Askari & Gholamhossein Shahgholi & Yousef Abbaspour-Gilandeh, 2017. "The effect of tine, wing, operating depth and speed on the draft requirement of subsoil tillage tines," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(4), pages 160-167.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlrae:v:63:y:2017:i:4:id:4-2016-rae
    DOI: 10.17221/4/2016-RAE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rae.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4/2016-RAE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://rae.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4/2016-RAE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/4/2016-RAE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Askari & M.H. Komarizade & A.M. Nikbakht & N. Nobakht & R.F. Teimourlou, 2011. "A novel three-point hitch dynamometer to measure the draft requirement of mounted implements," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(4), pages 128-136.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Hashaam & Muhammad Waqar Akram & Moaz Ahmad & Muhammad Zuhaib Akram & Muhammad Faheem & Muhammad Maqsood & Muhammad Aleem, 2023. "3D finite element analysis of tine cultivator and soil deformation," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(3), pages 107-117.
    2. Mahmood Reza Salar & Seyed Hossein Karparvarfard & Mohammad Askari & Hoda Kargarpour, 2021. "Forces and loosening characteristics of a new winged chisel plough," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(1), pages 17-25.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Abbaspour-Gilandeh Y.; Khanramaki M. (2013): Design; construction and calibration of a triaxial dynamometer for measuring forces and moments applied on tillage implements in field conditions. Journal of Metrology Society of India; 282: 119-127. Abo Al-Kheer A.; Kharmanda M.G.; El Hami A.; Mouazen A.M. (2011): Estimating the variability of tillage forces on a chisel plough shank by modeling the variability of tillage system parameters. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture; 781: 61-70. Ahmed M.H.; Godwin R.J. (1983): The influence of wing position on subsoiler penetration and soil disturbance. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research; 281: 489-492. Alimardani R.; Fazel Z.; Akram A.; Mahmoudi A.; Varnamkhasti M.G. (2008): Design and development of a three-point hitch dynamometer. Journal of Agricultural Technology; 43: 37-52. Al-Suhaibani A.S.; Al-Jnobi A.A.; Al-Majhadi Y.N. (2006): Tractors and tillage implements performance. In: Proceedings from the Canadian Society for Bio Engineering (CSBE-SCGAB) Annual Conference. Paper No. 06-129. July 16-19; 2006. Edmonton; Alberta. Arvidsson J.; Keller T.; Gustafsson K. (2004): Specific draught for mouldboard plough; chisel plough and disc harrow at different water contents. Soil and Tillage Research; 792: 221-231. ASABE Standards (2009): ASAE D497.6; Agricultural machinery management data. Available at www.asabe.org ASAE Standard (2000): ASAE D497.4. Agricultural Machinery Management Data. St. Joseph; ASAE. Askari M.; Komarizade M.H.; Nikbakht A.M.; Nobakht N.; Teimourlou R.F. (2011): A novel three-point hitch dynamometer to measure the draft requirement of mounted implements. Research in Agricultural Engineering; 574: 128-136. Bashford L.L.; Byerly D.V.; Grisso R.D. (1991): Draft and energy requirements of agricultural implements in semi-arid regions of Morocco. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia; Africa and Latin America; 223: 79-82. Buston M.J.; Rackham D.H. (1981): Vibratory soil cutting-II; and improved mathematical models. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research; 265: 419-439. Celik A.; Raper R.L. (2012): Design and evaluation of ground-driven rotary subsoilers. Soil and Tillage Research; 124: 203-210. Desbiolles J.M.A.; Godwin R.J.; Kilgour J.; Blackmore B.S. (1997): A novel approach to the prediction of tillage tool draught using a standard tine. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research; 662: 295-309. Di Prinzio A.P.; Ayala C.D.; Magdalena J.C. (1997): Energy evaluation of different techniques and subsoiling effects on soil bulk density. Agro-Science; 131: 61-67. Durairaj C.D.; Balasubramanian M. (1997). Influence of tool angles and speed on the soil reactions of a bentleg plough in two soils. Soil and Tillage Research; 442: 137-150. Esehaghbeygi A.; Tabatabaeefar A.; Raoufat M.H.; Keyhani A.R. (2002): Development and field evaluation of an oblique blade subsoiler and comparison of performance with a conventional L-shape subsoiler. Agricultural Sciences; 123: 67-81. Glancey J.L.; Upadhyaya S.K.; Chancellor W.J.; Rumsey J.W. (1996): Prediction of agricultural implement draft using an instrumented analog tillage tool. Soil and Tillage Research; 373: 47-65. Godwin R.J.; Spoor G.; Leeds-Harrison P. (1981): An experimental investigation into the force mechanics and resulting soil disturbance of mole ploughs. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research; 262: 477-497. Page Harrison H. (1988): Soil Reacting Forces for a Bentleg Plow. Transactions of the ASAE; 31: 47-51. Harison H.P. (1982): Soil reaction from laboratory studies with an inclined blade. Transactions of ASAE; 251: 7-12. Kheiralla A.F.; Azmi Y.; Zohadie M.; Ishak W. (2004): Modeling of power and energy forces for tillage implements operating in Serdang sandy clay loam; Malaysia. Soil and Tillage Research; 78: 21-34. Manuwa S.I.; Ademosun O.C. (2007): Draught and soil disturbance of model tillage tines under varying soil parameters. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR journal; 154: 1-18. Manuwa S.I. (2009): Performance evaluation of tillage tines operating under different depths in a sandy clay loam soil. Soil and Tillage Research; 103: 399-405. Moeenifar A.; Mousavi-Seyedi S.R.; Kalantari D. (2014): Influence of tillage depth; penetration angle and forward speed on the soil/thin-blade interaction force. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR Journal; 161: 69-74. Ramadhan M.N. (2014): Development and performance evaluation of the double tines subsoiler in silty clay soil part1: draft force; disturbed area and specific resistance. Mesopotamia Journal of Agriculture; 421: 293-313. Ramadhan M.N. (2011): Field study to evaluate the mechanical performance of the double tines longitudinally arranged subsoiler and its effect on some growth characteristics of barley Hordeum vulgare L. ; [MSc. Thesis.] College of Agriculture; Basrah University; Iraq. Ranjbarian S.; Askari M.; Jannatkhah J. (2017): Performance of tractor and tillage implements in clay soil. Journal of Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences; 16: 152-164. Raper R.L. (2005): Agricultural traffic effects on soil. Journal of Terramechanics; 423: 259-280. Sahu R.K.; Raheman H. (2006): Draft prediction of agricultural implements using reference tillage tools in sandy clay loam soil. Biosystems Engineering; 942: 275-284. Spoor G.; Godwin R.J. (1978): An experimental investigation into the deep loosening of soil by rigid tines. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research; 231: 243-252. Summers J.D.; Khalilian A.; Batchelder D.G. (1986): Draft relationships for primary tillage in Oklahoma soils. Transactions of ASAE; 291: 37-39. Thake J.R. (1981): Measurement of the forces acting on a paraplow tine. [MSc.Thesis.] National College of Agricultural engineering; Cranfield institute of technology; Australia;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlrae:v:63:y:2017:i:4:id:4-2016-rae. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.