IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlrae/v63y2017i2id10-2016-rae.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of efficiency of technologies for wastewater sludge hygienisation

Author

Listed:
  • Petr Junga
  • Pavel Mach

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Mareček

    (Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Agronomy, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The paper compares the methods of hygienisation of wastewater treatment plants sludges with respect to meet legislative requirements of conditions for using the treated sludge on agricultural land. The paper draws a comparison of the experimental results between the method of hygienisation and stabilisation of the sludge through the autothermic aerobic thermophilic stabilisation (AATS) by pure oxygen and the method of sludge hygienisation by pasteurization. Results of the experiment confirm that sewage sludge treated by both assessed hygienisation technologies meets legislation requirements for application to agricultural soil.

Suggested Citation

  • Petr Junga & Pavel Mach & Jan Mareček, 2017. "Evaluation of efficiency of technologies for wastewater sludge hygienisation," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(2), pages 54-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlrae:v:63:y:2017:i:2:id:10-2016-rae
    DOI: 10.17221/10/2016-RAE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rae.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/10/2016-RAE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://rae.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/10/2016-RAE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/10/2016-RAE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlrae:v:63:y:2017:i:2:id:10-2016-rae. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.