IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpse/v69y2023i12id336-2023-pse.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on yield of grain, yield of protein and oil of soybean

Author

Listed:
  • Marija Bajagić

    (University of Bijeljina, Faculty of Agriculture - Bijeljina, Republic Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Vojin Đukić

    (Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Zlatica Miladinov Mamlić

    (Institute of Field and Vegetable Crops Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia)

  • Jovana Sekulić

    (University of Kragujevac, Institute of Information Technologies Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia)

  • Vojin Cvijanović

    (Institute for Science Application in Agriculture, Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Nenad Đurić

    (Institute for Vegetable Crops Smederevska Palanka, Smederevska Palanka, Serbia)

  • Gorica Cvijanović

    (University of Bijeljina, Faculty of Agriculture - Bijeljina, Republic Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

Abstract

One of the latest environmentally friendly methods in soybean production technology is the pulsed electromagnetic field of low frequencies (PEMP). The paper presents the results of the influence of electromagnetic stimulation of soybean seeds on grain yield, protein and oil yield, depending on different agroclimatic conditions, exposure time and frequency. In the 2012-2017 research period, the soybean cv. Valjevka was used in the Institute of Field and Vegetable Agriculture experimental field, Novi Sad, Serbia. Immediately before sowing, the seeds were subjected to PEMP treatment, with a pulse generator and a tape applicator, in the following variants: electromagnetic field frequencies of 16, 24 and 30 Hz, and exposure time of 0, 30 and 60 min. The most successful variant of seed stimulation for all three examined parameters was at 16 Hz and 30 min, where the research results show that this measure can increase the examined parameters by more than 10%. The average yield of grain for all years of research with seed stimulation was 4.85% (3 338 kg/ha) compared to the control (3 203 kg/ha). The average grain protein yield in the treatments with PEMP was 1 315 kg/ha, which was 4.26% higher compared to the variant without PEMP (1 260 kg/ha), and the treatment was 4% higher in the average oil yield, 703 kg/ha compared to the control 676 kg/ha. Also, the analysis of the mutual dependence of the indicators is in a positive correlation, which is essential for plant breeding and the development of new technologies, which have economic justification, are safe for use and have a positive impact on adverse effects such as drought.

Suggested Citation

  • Marija Bajagić & Vojin Đukić & Zlatica Miladinov Mamlić & Jovana Sekulić & Vojin Cvijanović & Nenad Đurić & Gorica Cvijanović, 2023. "Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on yield of grain, yield of protein and oil of soybean," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(12), pages 577-585.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:69:y:2023:i:12:id:336-2023-pse
    DOI: 10.17221/336/2023-PSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/336/2023-PSE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/336/2023-PSE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/336/2023-PSE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olena Sobko & Jens Hartung & Sabine Zikeli & Wilhelm Claupein & Sabine Gruber, 2019. "Effect of sowing density on grain yield, protein and oil content and plant morphology of soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill)," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(12), pages 594-601.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:69:y:2023:i:12:id:336-2023-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.