IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpse/v63y2017i4id64-2017-pse.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of fertilization, burning, and grazing on plant community in the long-term fenced grasslands

Author

Listed:
  • Guanghua JING

    (Institute of Soil and Water Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi, P.R. China)

  • Wei LI

    (Institute of Soil and Water Conversion, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, P.R. China)

  • Kailiang YU

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA)

  • Zak RATAJCZAK

    (Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA)

  • Robert L. KALLENBACH

    (Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, USA)

  • Jimin CHENG

    (Institute of Soil and Water Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi, P.R. China)

Abstract

Fencing is the common management practice to restore degraded grasslands. However, long-term fencing decreases grassland productivity and species diversity. The study was therefore conducted as a three-year (2011-2013) experiment with a randomized complete block in a grassland fenced for 20 years in the Loess Plateau of China, and the effects of fertilization, burning and grazing on aboveground biomass, species and functional group composition, species and some functional group diversity were analysed. Our results showed that the functional group of perennial bunchgrasses dominated the grassland regardless of management practices. However, burning altered species composition (i.e. the unpalatable species, Artemisia sacrorum) more significantly than fertilization or grazing, and surprisingly, nearly quadrupled the functional group of shrubs and semi-shrubs. Fertilization had a positive effect on the aboveground biomass (44.0%), while clearly reducing species diversity (21.9%). Grazing decreased aboveground biomass, but increased species diversity by 15.9%. This study indicated that fertilization influenced plant community through its impact on aboveground biomass, while burning changed plant community by altering dominant species. Thus, it was concluded that fertilizer could further improve community biomass while burning reduced the edibility of grass. Grazing could be carried out to enhance the biodiversity in the long-term fenced grasslands.

Suggested Citation

  • Guanghua JING & Wei LI & Kailiang YU & Zak RATAJCZAK & Robert L. KALLENBACH & Jimin CHENG, 2017. "Effects of fertilization, burning, and grazing on plant community in the long-term fenced grasslands," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(4), pages 171-176.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:63:y:2017:i:4:id:64-2017-pse
    DOI: 10.17221/64/2017-PSE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/64/2017-PSE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/64/2017-PSE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/64/2017-PSE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allison M Veach & Walter K Dodds & Adam Skibbe, 2014. "Fire and Grazing Influences on Rates of Riparian Woody Plant Expansion along Grassland Streams," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-8, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:63:y:2017:i:4:id:64-2017-pse. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.