IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpps/v55y2019i3id38-2018-pps.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterisation and pathogenicity of Cryphonectria parasitica on sweet chestnut and sessile oak trees in Serbia

Author

Listed:
  • Dragan Karadžić

    (Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Zlatan Radulović

    (Institute of Forestry, Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Katarzyna Sikora

    (Department of Forest Protection, Forest Research Institute - IBL, Sękocin Stary, Poland)

  • Zoran Stanivuković

    (Department of the Integral Protection of Forest Ecosystems, Faculty of Forestry, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina)

  • Vesna Golubović Ćurguz

    (Department of Landscape Architecture and Horticulture, Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Tomasz Oszako

    (Department of Forest Protection, Forest Research Institute - IBL, Sękocin Stary, Poland)

  • Ivan Milenković

    (Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
    Phytophthora Research Centre, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The presence of Cryphonectria parasitica (Murrill) M.E. Barr was studied in six natural and planted stands of sweet chestnut in Serbia. The fungus was detected on the sweet chestnut in five localities and on the sessile oak in one locality. In total, 77 isolates from the sweet chestnut and five isolates from the sessile oak were obtained. Based on the culture morphology, all the obtained isolates were proven to be free from Cryphonectria (Saccardo) Saccardo & D. Saccardo hypovirus. The isolates of C. parasitica from the sweet chestnut were compatible with three different vegetative compatibility types, EU-12, EU-2, and EU-1, while the isolates from the sessile oak belonged to EU-12. After inoculation in laboratory conditions, the isolate from the sweet chestnut and sessile oak caused the decline in 88 and 76% of the sweet chestnut plants, respectively. In the case of the sessile oak, both isolates caused the decline in 52% of the plants. In field conditions, both isolates were aggressive to sessile oak trees after previous bark wounds and they were statistically significantly different compared to the control trees. The isolate from the sweet chestnut caused significantly larger cankers compared to both the isolate from the sessile oak and the control.

Suggested Citation

  • Dragan Karadžić & Zlatan Radulović & Katarzyna Sikora & Zoran Stanivuković & Vesna Golubović Ćurguz & Tomasz Oszako & Ivan Milenković, 2019. "Characterisation and pathogenicity of Cryphonectria parasitica on sweet chestnut and sessile oak trees in Serbia," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(3), pages 191-201.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:55:y:2019:i:3:id:38-2018-pps
    DOI: 10.17221/38/2018-PPS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/38/2018-PPS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/38/2018-PPS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/38/2018-PPS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:55:y:2019:i:3:id:38-2018-pps. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.