IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpps/v52y2016i3id90-2015-pps.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of two host plants, Helianthus annuus L. and Sinapis arvensis L., on life table parameters of Nysius cymoides (Spinola) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) under laboratory conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Mehdi Mollashahi

    (Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
    Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad-e Kavus, Iran)

  • Ahad Sahragard

    (Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran)

  • Jafar Mohaghegh

    (Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection (IRIPP), Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran)

  • Reza Hosseini

    (Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran)

  • Hossein Sabouri

    (Department of Crop Production, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Gonbad Kavous University, Gonbad-e Kavus, Iran)

Abstract

The false chinch bug, Nysius cymoides (Spinola) is a pest of sunflower attacking sunflower fields from their weedy and cultivated hosts. The effect of sunflower and wild mustard (wild host) on the life table parameters of N. cymoides was studied under laboratory conditions (24 ± 1°C, 65 ± 5% RH, a 16:8 h (L:D) photoperiod). Data were analysed based on the age-stage, two-sex life table theory. Developmental time (sum of incubation and nymphal periods) on wild mustard was longer than on sunflower with significant difference (P < 0.05). The adult longevity was significantly shorter on wild mustard than on sunflower. The adult pre-oviposition period (APOP), total pre-oviposition period (TPOP), mean fecundity and adult longevity reared on sunflower and wild mustard showed significant differences (P < 0.05). The highest fecundity (58.72 eggs) and the longest female longevity (68.09 days) were on sunflower and lowest fecundity (5.67 eggs) was on wild mustard. The intrinsic rate of increase (r) on sunflower was higher than that on wild mustard, as it was 0.0437 ± 0.0039 on sunflower and 0.00033 ± 0.00599 per day on wild mustard and net reproductive rate (R0) on sunflower and wild mustard was 12.94 ± 2.77 and 1.075 ± 0.34 (offspring), respectively. The mean generation time (T) was 58.01 ± 1.59 and 56.76 ± 2.43 days, on sunflower and wild mustard, respectively. The life expectancy (exj), survival rate (sxj), and cumulative reproductive rate (Rx) on sunflower were higher than wild mustard. The results showed that sunflower was more suitable host than wild mustard to N. cymoides.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehdi Mollashahi & Ahad Sahragard & Jafar Mohaghegh & Reza Hosseini & Hossein Sabouri, 2016. "Effect of two host plants, Helianthus annuus L. and Sinapis arvensis L., on life table parameters of Nysius cymoides (Spinola) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) under laboratory conditions," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(3), pages 209-216.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:52:y:2016:i:3:id:90-2015-pps
    DOI: 10.17221/90/2015-PPS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/90/2015-PPS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/90/2015-PPS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/90/2015-PPS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:52:y:2016:i:3:id:90-2015-pps. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.