IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpps/v52y2016i2id5-2015-pps.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Susceptibility of field and laboratory strains of Cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to spinosad pesticide under laboratory conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed

    (Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
    Center for Health and the Environment, Environmental Toxicology Department, University of California Davis, Davis, USA)

  • Sobhy Ahmed Hasan Temerak

    (Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt)

  • Farouk Abdel-Kawi Abdel-Galil

    (Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt)

  • Samir Hasan Mohamed Manna

    (Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt)

Abstract

The susceptibility of field and laboratory strains against all instars larvae of S. littoralis to spinosad pesticide after a 24- and 48-h exposure and under laboratory conditions was investigated. As a result against 1st instar larvae, the LC50 values after 24 h were 12 and 0.275 µg/ml for laboratory and field strain, respectively. In addition, the resistance ratio (RR) of 1st instar was 43.64-fold. In this interim, the 48 h LC50 values were 8.7 and 0.18 µg/ml for laboratory and field strain, respectively and the RR was 48.33-fold, which revealed the field strain was more susceptible to spinosad than the laboratory strain. Distinctly similar trend was shown for later instar larvae stages. For instance, in 6th instar larvae, the LC50 values after a 24-h exposure to spinosad were 1100 and 105 µg/ml for the laboratory and field strain, respectively, and the RR value was 10.48-fold. Furthermore, after a 48-h exposure, the LC50 values for laboratory and field strains were 500 and 42 µg/ml, respectively, with RR value being 11.90-fold. On the other hand, according to relative tolerance values, the 6th instar larvae were the most tolerant instar of all the instars tested. The susceptibility of 6th, 5th, and 4th instar larvae was comparable and significantly lower than that of 3rd, 2nd, and 1st instar larvae. However, the 1st instar was the least tolerant. The results implied that spinosad may play a potential role in the control of S. littoralis and, therefore, it is considered a promising tool in integrated pest management program to control Cotton leafworm which is becoming resistant to conventional pesticides in Egypt.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed & Sobhy Ahmed Hasan Temerak & Farouk Abdel-Kawi Abdel-Galil & Samir Hasan Mohamed Manna, 2016. "Susceptibility of field and laboratory strains of Cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to spinosad pesticide under laboratory conditions," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(2), pages 128-133.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:52:y:2016:i:2:id:5-2015-pps
    DOI: 10.17221/5/2015-PPS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/5/2015-PPS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/5/2015-PPS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/5/2015-PPS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:52:y:2016:i:2:id:5-2015-pps. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.