IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v63y2018i8id118-2017-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In vitro bioactivity of various pure flavonoids in ruminal fermentation, with special reference to methane formation

Author

Listed:
  • Susanne Sinz

    (ETH Zürich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland)

  • Carmen Kunz

    (ETH Zürich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland)

  • Annette Liesegang

    (Institute of Animal Nutrition, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland)

  • Ueli Braun

    (Department of Farm Animals, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland)

  • Svenja Marquardt

    (ETH Zürich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland)

  • Carla R. Soliva

    (ETH Zürich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland)

  • Michael Kreuzer

    (ETH Zürich, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Polyphenols, like flavonoids, have been investigated when present in intact plants or in extracts as methane mitigating dietary supplements in ruminants. The aim of the present study was to examine pure compounds in a short-term in vitro experiment using the Hohenheim Gas Test method. We focused on the group of the flavonoids and tested which of them had the potential to mitigate methane without negatively affecting ruminal fermentation. Eight flavonoids were tested: epicatechin, luteolin-7-glucoside, quercetin, and isoquercetin in Experiment 1; catechin, gallocatechin, epigallocatechin, and epigallocatechin gallate in Experiment 2. Tannic acid, no flavonoid but a phenolic acid with known methane mitigating properties, served as positive control, and the unsupplemented basal diet as negative control. In both experiments, each of these compounds (including tannic acid) was tested at dosages of 0.5, 5.0, and 50.0 mg/g basal diet dry matter (DM) in four runs each. Gallocatechin, tannic acid, and epigallocatechin gallate (50 mg/g DM) lowered fermentation gas formation and in vitro organic matter digestibility relative to the negative control (Experiment 2). Apart from tannic acid, epicatechin, quercetin, isoquercetin, and luteolin-7-glucoside (5 and 50 mg/g DM) reduced the amount of CH4 produced in relation to total gas produced (Experiment 1). The incubation fluid ammonia concentration was decreased with luteolin-7-glucoside and tannic acid (50 mg/g DM). From the flavonoids tested especially luteolin-7-glucoside seems to have a similar potential as tannic acid to mitigate methane and ammonia formation during ruminal fermentation in vitro, both favourable in environmental respect. These results need to be confirmed in live animals.

Suggested Citation

  • Susanne Sinz & Carmen Kunz & Annette Liesegang & Ueli Braun & Svenja Marquardt & Carla R. Soliva & Michael Kreuzer, 2018. "In vitro bioactivity of various pure flavonoids in ruminal fermentation, with special reference to methane formation," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(8), pages 293-304.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:63:y:2018:i:8:id:118-2017-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/118/2017-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/118/2017-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/118/2017-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/118/2017-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. F. Leiber & C. Kunz & M. Kreuzer, 2012. "Influence of different morphological parts of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) and its major secondary metabolite rutin on rumen fermentation in vitro," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(1), pages 10-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:63:y:2018:i:8:id:118-2017-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.