IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v61y2016i9id14-2016-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Haematological and biochemical response of burbot (Lota lota L.) exposed to four different anaesthetics

Author

Listed:
  • P. Svačina

    (South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Vodňany, Czech Republic)

  • J. Příborský

    (South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Vodňany, Czech Republic)

  • M. Blecha

    (South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Vodňany, Czech Republic)

  • T. Policar

    (South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Vodňany, Czech Republic)

  • J. Velíšek

    (South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Vodňany, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of four anaesthetics on haematological and biochemical blood profiles in burbot Lota lota L. Blood profiles of burbot were evaluated 10 min and 24 h after anaesthesia with tricaine methanesulfonate (MS 222) (100 mg/l), clove oil (33 mg/l), 2-phenoxyethanol (0.3 ml/l), Propiscin (1 ml/l) and compared to non-anaesthetized control. The tested anaesthetics had no effect on haematological profile of burbot. The exposure to clove oil, 2-phenoxyethanol, and Propiscin significantly (P < 0.01) influenced the level of ammonia and glucose. The level of lactate was significantly (P < 0.01) increased following anaesthesia with 2-phenoxyethanol and Propiscin. The levels of total protein, aspartate aminotransferase, and calcium were higher (P < 0.01) with clove oil, 2-phenoxyethanol, and Propiscin compared to control. The use of MS 222 showed the lowest effect on haematological and biochemical blood profile and is recommended as a suitable anaesthetic for burbot.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Svačina & J. Příborský & M. Blecha & T. Policar & J. Velíšek, 2016. "Haematological and biochemical response of burbot (Lota lota L.) exposed to four different anaesthetics," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(9), pages 414-420.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:61:y:2016:i:9:id:14-2016-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/14/2016-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/14/2016-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/14/2016-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/14/2016-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Velisek & Z. Svobodova & V. Piackova & L. Groch & L. Nepejchalova, 2005. "Effects of clove oil anaesthesia on common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.)," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 50(6), pages 269-275.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J. Velisek & T. Wlasow & P. Gomulka & Z. Svobodova & L. Novotny, 2007. "Effects of 2-phenoxyethanol anaesthesia on sheatfish (Silurus glanis L.)," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(3), pages 103-110.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:61:y:2016:i:9:id:14-2016-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.