IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v60y2015i6id8237-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Male pronucleus formation after ICSI: effect of oocyte cysteine or sperm Triton X-100 treatments

Author

Listed:
  • E. Garcia-Mengual

    (Centre for Animal Technology Research, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Segorbe, Spain
    Reproductive Genetics Unit, Sistemas Genómicos S.L., Parque Tecnológico de Valencia, Paterna, Spain)

  • M.A. Silvestre

    (Centre for Animal Technology Research, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Segorbe, Spain
    Department of Functional Biology and Physical Anthropology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain)

  • I. Salvador

    (Centre for Animal Technology Research, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Segorbe, Spain)

  • A. Cebrian-Serrano

    (Centre for Animal Technology Research, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Agrarias, Segorbe, Spain
    Neurogenetics group, Center of Excellence Hearing4All, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany)

  • E. Garcia-Rosello

    (Faculty of Veterinary Science, CEU Cardenal Herrera University, Valencia, Spain)

Abstract

In pigs, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) efficiency is still poor. The inadequate decondensation of the sperm chromatin, its transformation into the male pronucleus (MPN) together with the subsequent inability to activate the oocyte, seem to be the main causes of the low ICSI efficiency. In order to improve the MPN formation we took two different approaches. On the one hand, the in vitro culture (IVC) medium post-ICSI was supplemented with 1.71mM cysteine (CYS). Alternatively, the sperm membrane was digested with Triton X-100 (TX) before ICSI, to improve the exposure of the sperm chromatin to the oocyte cytoplasm. After 6 h post-ICSI, the activation rate was significantly higher in TX group (70.0%) compared with CYS and control groups (42.2% and 48.9%, respectively; P < 0.05). However, no significant differences between the three groups were observed in terms of the number of pronuclei, 2PN (oocytes with 2 pronuclei and no visible sperm), and 1PN + sperm (oocytes with 1 pronucleus and one sperm head). At 22 h post-ICSI, the activation rates were similar in TX, CYS, and control groups (73.1, 78.9, and 75.7%, respectively). In addition, we did not observe significant differences between TX, CYS, and control groups for the number of pronuclei, 2PN (52.6, 56.7, and 50%, respectively) or 1PN + sperm (21.1, 33.3, and 32.1%, respectively). While no cleavage was observed in the CYS group, no significant differences in the cleavage rate were observed between control (21.3%) and TX (10.5%) groups. In summary, and under our conditions, neither CYS supplement, nor sperm TX pre-treatment were able to improve MPN formation at 6 and 22 h post-ICSI. However, the sperm TX pre-treatment improved oocyte activation at 6 h post-ICSI, although 22 h post-ICSI such a beneficial effect did not persist.

Suggested Citation

  • E. Garcia-Mengual & M.A. Silvestre & I. Salvador & A. Cebrian-Serrano & E. Garcia-Rosello, 2015. "Male pronucleus formation after ICSI: effect of oocyte cysteine or sperm Triton X-100 treatments," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 60(6), pages 241-249.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:60:y:2015:i:6:id:8237-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/8237-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/8237-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/8237-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/8237-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:60:y:2015:i:6:id:8237-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.