IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v59y2014i9id7654-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goat mastitis detection using daily records of milk conductivity: comparative results of different algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • G. Romero

    (Department of Agro-Food Technology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Orihuela, Spain)

  • D. Reinemann

    (Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA)

  • M. Alejandro

    (Department of Agro-Food Technology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Orihuela, Spain)

  • J.R. Díaz

    (Department of Agro-Food Technology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Orihuela, Spain)

Abstract

Milk electrical conductivity is employed for mastitis detection in cows due to its automation, low cost, and infection detectability at early stage. Nevertheless, the number of publications about its use in dairy goats is scarce. The aim of this study was to check and compare the detectability of goat mastitis (sensitivity and specificity) using different algorithms, constructed with individual daily conductivity data from glands, in order to improve the know how about the potential of this variable for goat mastitis detection. A total of 18 goats (8 primiparous and 10 multiparous) free of mastitis were used, and gland milk conductivity was daily monitored. After 16 days of monitoring, some unfavourable situations for gland health were simulated in order to increase the cases of infection. Once infection was established (9 goats and 12 glands got infected), the experiment continued for further 16 days. A total of 19 different algorithms that employed conductivity data from gland were designed; they were tested using gland milk conductivity (EC) and ratio of EC of collateral glands in the same goat (RATEC). The algorithms were tested in all the animals and intramammary infection detection ability characteristics (sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV)) were recorded. All clinical cases were detected (n = 2, 100% SENS) with all the algorithms. Best global SENS (clinical and subclinical, 33.3-58.3%) and SPEC (77.8-100%) were similar to results reported in previous studies in cows, and obtained with algorithms ARIMA and Rule 1 (3 standard deviations of data). The best algorithms to use in mastitis detection depend on the prevalence and type of mastitis. EC ARIMA and Rule 1 algorithms detected the most severe cases on-line and quickly, with a low proportion of false positives.

Suggested Citation

  • G. Romero & D. Reinemann & M. Alejandro & J.R. Díaz, 2014. "Goat mastitis detection using daily records of milk conductivity: comparative results of different algorithms," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(9), pages 428-434.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:59:y:2014:i:9:id:7654-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/7654-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/7654-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/7654-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/7654-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:59:y:2014:i:9:id:7654-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.