IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjf/v39y2021i5id261-2020-cjfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study of physicochemical and hedonic response of ginger rhizome and leaves enriched patties

Author

Listed:
  • Saira Tanweer

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Islamia University Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan)

  • Muhammad Farhan Jahangir Chughtai

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan)

  • Saadia Zainab

    (College of Food Science and Technology, Henan University of Technology, Zhenzhou, China)

  • Tariq Mehmood

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan)

  • Adnan Khaliq

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan)

  • Syed Junaid-Ur-Rahman

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan)

  • Rabia Iqbal

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Technology, Government College Women University, Madina Town Faisalabad, Pakistan)

  • Atif Liaqat

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan)

  • Samreen Ahsan

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, Khawaja Fareed University of Engineering and Information Technology, Rahim Yar Khan, Pakistan)

  • Zulfiqar Ahmad

    (Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, Islamia University Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan)

  • Aamir Shehzad

    (Food Science and Agro-Industry, UniLaSalle International Campus de Rouen - Normandy University, Mont-Saint-Aignan, France)

Abstract

The present investigation was an attempt to compare the phytoceutic potential of ginger rhizome and ginger leaves of the Suravi variety. For this purpose, both rhizome and leaves were dried and used for the preparation of patties. After that, patties were assessed for colour tonality, texture, total phenolic content and hedonic response such as colour, taste, flavour, texture and overall acceptability. The results depicted that L* and b* values changed significantly during the storage interval; however, b* value was also affected by treatments whilst L* and a* values did not impart any momentous effect. For texture, the highest value was observed for patties with ginger rhizome powder (0.067 ± 0.0032 N) followed by patties with ginger leaf powder (0.060 ± 0.0029 N) and then control patties (0.057 ± 0.0026 N). For total phenolic content (TPC), maximum phenolic contents were observed as 84.80 ± 3.31 mg GAE 100 g-1 in treatment T2 followed by 75.68 ± 2.95 mg GAE 100 g-1 in T1 and 61.70 ± 2.41 mg GAE 100 g-1 in T0. For hedonic response, all the parameters changed significantly during the storage interval; however, flavour, taste and overall acceptability changed momentously with treatments. The findings of the current investigation demonstrated that ginger leaves have a higher antioxidant potential as compared to the ginger rhizome and control patties, and they should be incorporated into food products.

Suggested Citation

  • Saira Tanweer & Muhammad Farhan Jahangir Chughtai & Saadia Zainab & Tariq Mehmood & Adnan Khaliq & Syed Junaid-Ur-Rahman & Rabia Iqbal & Atif Liaqat & Samreen Ahsan & Zulfiqar Ahmad & Aamir Shehzad, 2021. "Comparative study of physicochemical and hedonic response of ginger rhizome and leaves enriched patties," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 39(5), pages 402-409.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:39:y:2021:i:5:id:261-2020-cjfs
    DOI: 10.17221/261/2020-CJFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/261/2020-CJFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/261/2020-CJFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/261/2020-CJFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:39:y:2021:i:5:id:261-2020-cjfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.