IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjf/v31y2013i2id127-2012-cjfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differentiation between fresh and thawed chicken meats

Author

Listed:
  • Anna ŠIMONIOVÁ

    (Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Bo-Anne ROHLÍK

    (Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Tereza ŠKORPILOVÁ

    (Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Michaela PETROVÁ

    (Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Petr PIPEK

    (Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemical Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Adulteration of fresh meat and its possible substitution with frozen and thawed meat represents a problem, since thawed meat has not only lower sensory qualities than fresh meat but also a lower price. Commercial enzymatic kits seem to be a solution to reveal such unfair practises and were applied to detect the activity of specific enzymes, citrate synthase, mitochondrial enzymes that are released from the organelles destroyed by frost. We determined, whether the meat of slaughtered chicken was fresh or frozen/thawed, and to provide convincing results. The absolute results vary with the type of meat and depend on the enzyme used. However, the enzyme activity in the exudates of frozen/thawed meat is always higher than in fresh meat. This value further increases with each subsequent freezing cycle. The determination of citrate synthase activity was done only in the exudate released from the examined meat samples. However, to determine the enzymes activity directly in unpacked meat, which have not released any exudate, is the subject of further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna ŠIMONIOVÁ & Bo-Anne ROHLÍK & Tereza ŠKORPILOVÁ & Michaela PETROVÁ & Petr PIPEK, 2013. "Differentiation between fresh and thawed chicken meats," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 31(2), pages 108-115.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:31:y:2013:i:2:id:127-2012-cjfs
    DOI: 10.17221/127/2012-CJFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/127/2012-CJFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/127/2012-CJFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/127/2012-CJFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiahui JIN & Xiaodan WANG & Yunxiu HAN & Yaoxuan CAI & Yingming CAI & Hongmei WANG & Lingtao ZHU & Liping XU & Lei ZHAO & Zhiyuan LI, 2016. "Combined beef thawing using response surface methodology," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 34(6), pages 547-553.
    2. Edita RAUDIENÉ & Darius GAILIUS & Rimanté VINAUSKIENÉ & Viktorija EISINAITÉ & Gintautas BALČINAS & Justina DOBILIENÉ & Laura TAMKUTÉ, 2018. "Rapid evaluation of fresh chicken meat quality by electronic nose," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 36(5), pages 420-426.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:31:y:2013:i:2:id:127-2012-cjfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.