IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/v59y2013i2id102-2012-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The priorities of rural development in EU countries in years 2007-2013

Author

Listed:
  • Arkasiusz SADOWSKI

    (Department of Economics and Economic Policy in Agribusiness, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland)

  • Wawrzyniec CZUBAK

    (Department of Economics and Economic Policy in Agribusiness, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Poznan, Poland)

Abstract

The diversified level of agricultural development and directions of evolution of rural areas in the individual EU countries results in complex and diversified problems for the agricultural policy. That was a basic reason of giving a relatively great freedom to the individual member states to choose measures within the individual axes of the Rural Development Programmes. The allocation of expenses to the individual measures Member States should ensure that synergies among the economic, environmental and social aspects and, by assumption, it is supposed to reflect the priorities of rural development. The analysis of the allocation of expenses within the national rural development programmes will indicate similarities and differences of the use of the CAP support in the regional aspect. The main goal of the paper was to determine the priorities of rural development in the individual EU member states. As results from the analysis the specific character of the individual programmes corresponded to the level of development of the individual countries and the needs of the agribusiness and rural areas resulting from that level. The diversification concerning the directions of use of the assets from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development resulted from the different wealth of the societies and rural communities in the individual countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Arkasiusz SADOWSKI & Wawrzyniec CZUBAK, 2013. "The priorities of rural development in EU countries in years 2007-2013," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 59(2), pages 58-73.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:59:y:2013:i:2:id:102-2012-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/102/2012-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/102/2012-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/102/2012-AGRICECON.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/102/2012-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Z. Bednaříková & T. Doucha, 2009. "The impacts of agricultural policy scenarios on development of remote rural areas - the case study of the Bruntál and Ostrava districts," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(4), pages 161-168.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicoleta Mihaela Florea & Roxana Maria Bădîrcea & Ramona Costina Pîrvu & Alina Georgiana Manta & Marius Dalian Doran & Elena Jianu, 2020. "The impact of agriculture and renewable energy on climate change in Central and East European Countries," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(10), pages 444-457.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel BADULESCU & Adriana GIURGIU & Nicolae ISTUDOR & Alina BADULESCU, 2015. "Rural tourism development and financing in Romania: A supply-side analysis," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(2), pages 72-82.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:59:y:2013:i:2:id:102-2012-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.