The welfare of poorer older people in Belgium and the Netherlands :An application of quantile regression
AbstractOn the basis of the SHARE data, we estimate age-conditional quantiles at the 5th, 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th and 50th percentile levels for equivalised gross income, net financial assets and consumption levels, as well as for a (remaining) lifetime utility indicator of people over the age of 50 in Belgium and the Netherlands. We conclude that the poor performance of Belgium in terms of older people’s income, compared with the Netherlands, is mitigated when the consumption figures are considered. However, the picture presented by the wealth figures is more diverse: the median net financial assets position for the 55-70 age group in Belgium is higher than that in the Netherlands, but their relative ranking on the basis of the first quartile value is reversed for several age groups. In terms of lifetime utility, the two countries do equally well. Income and asset poverty do not seem closely related to consumption poverty. Remarkably, the income distribution of the poorer half of older people in Belgium turns out to be skewed to the left, but income inequality is lower in Belgium than in the Netherlands. The reverse holds true for consumption inequality. Wealth inequality is highly skewed to the right in both countries, but no clear conclusions can be drawn about their relative ranking in terms of inequality.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles in its journal Brussels economic review.
Volume (Year): 52 (2009)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Welfare measurement; Life cycle hypothesis; Lifetime utility; Nonparametric quantile regression;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- I30 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General
- I31 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - General Welfare, Well-Being
- C31 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models; Quantile Regressions; Social Interaction Models
- C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benoit Pauwels).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.