IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/zfbrbw/v32y2020i6p347-355n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Factors of Collateralized Loan Obligations and Corporate Bonds

Author

Listed:
  • Wahrenburg Mark

    (Dr., Professor für Bankbetriebslehre, Goethe University Frankfurt, House of Finance, Frankfurt/M.)

  • Barth Andreas

    (Dr., Wissenschaftlicher Assistent, Goethe University Frankfurt, House of Finance, Frankfurt/M.)

  • Izadi Mohammad

    (PhD Student, Goethe University Frankfurt, House of Finance, Frankfurt/M.)

  • Rahhal Anas

    (Master Student, Goethe University Frankfurt, House of Finance, Frankfurt/M. We thank Christian Kopf, Alexander Ohl, and several members from Union Investment for helpful comments and suggestions.)

Abstract

Structured products like collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) tend to offer significantly higher yield spreads than corporate bonds (CBs) with the same rating. At the same time, empirical evidence does not indicate that this higher yield is reduced by higher default losses of CLOs. The evidence thus suggests that CLOs offer higher expected returns compared to CB with similar credit risk. This study aims to analyze whether this return difference is captured by asset pricing factors. We show that market risk is the predominant risk factor for both CBs and CLOs. CLO investors, however, additionally demand a premium for their risk exposure towards systemic risk. This premium is inversely related to the rating class of the CLO.

Suggested Citation

  • Wahrenburg Mark & Barth Andreas & Izadi Mohammad & Rahhal Anas, 2020. "Risk Factors of Collateralized Loan Obligations and Corporate Bonds," Zeitschrift für Bankrecht und Bankwirtschaft (ZBB) / Journal of Banking Law and Banking (JBB), RWS Verlag, vol. 32(6), pages 347-355, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:32:y:2020:i:6:p:347-355:n:4
    DOI: 10.15375/zbb-2020-0604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15375/zbb-2020-0604
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15375/zbb-2020-0604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:zfbrbw:v:32:y:2020:i:6:p:347-355:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.