IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/statpp/v3y2012i2p19n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Progress Towards Millennium Development Goal 4: A Call for Improved Validation of Under-Five Mortality Rate Estimates

Author

Listed:
  • Alkema Leontine

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Wong Maria B.

    (National University of Singapore)

  • Seah Pei Rong

    (National University of Singapore)

Abstract

Background: Millennium Development Goal 4 calls for a reduction in the under-5 mortality rate (U5MR) by two-thirds between 1990 and 2015. Due to issues with data quality and quantity, there is uncertainty about how much progress has been made in many countries, and conflicting estimates of the overall levels and rate of decline have been reported. Consequently, there is a clear and urgent need to validate estimates, but consensus guidelines for model validation are lacking. Methods: We propose a validation method, based on the question: If current U5MR estimation methodology had been used in the past, using all available data available at that time, how accurate would the U5MR estimates and uncertainty intervals have been?Findings: Validation of the estimates and uncertainty intervals reported in 2010 by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation showed that estimates of both the past absolute levels and the rate of decline in under-5 mortality between 1990 and 2000 would have changed significantly between 2004 and 2010 for many countries, with the inclusion of additional data. For high-mortality countries in particular, over 40% of the updated estimates for the U5MR in 2000 fell outside previously constructed 95% uncertainty intervals, and the absolute change in the estimated rate of decline was more than 1% for about three out of five countries.Interpretation: In light of evaluating Millennium Development Goal 4 in 2015, we hope that extensive model validation exercises will become standard practice for validating the accuracy of under-5 estimates and uncertainty intervals. Ultimately the goal of including appropriate validation methods is to improve the reliability of both estimates and uncertainty intervals, which will allow for a more fully informed assessment of both the absolute levels of, and rates of change in, the under-5 mortality rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Alkema Leontine & Wong Maria B. & Seah Pei Rong, 2012. "Monitoring Progress Towards Millennium Development Goal 4: A Call for Improved Validation of Under-Five Mortality Rate Estimates," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:3:y:2012:i:2:p:19:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/2151-7509.1043
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/2151-7509.1043
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/2151-7509.1043?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J Ties Boerma & Colin Mathers & Carla Abou-Zahr, 2010. "WHO and Global Health Monitoring: The Way Forward," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-3, November.
    2. Leontine Alkema & Wei Ling Ann, 2011. "Estimating the Under-Five Mortality Rate Using a Bayesian Hierarchical Time Series Model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(9), pages 1-9, September.
    3. Christopher J L Murray & Alan D Lopez, 2010. "Production and Analysis of Health Indicators: The Role of Academia," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(11), pages 1-3, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mosseveld, Cornelis van & Polanen Petel, Vincent van & Hernández-Peña, Patricia & Verbiest, Piet, 2018. "Health expenditure data for policy: Health accounts, national accounts or both?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(8), pages 885-891.
    2. Hari S Iyer & Lisa R Hirschhorn & Marie Paul Nisingizwe & Emmanuel Kamanzi & Peter C Drobac & Felix C Rwabukwisi & Michael R Law & Andrew Muhire & Vincent Rusanganwa & Paulin Basinga, 2017. "Impact of a district-wide health center strengthening intervention on healthcare utilization in rural Rwanda: Use of interrupted time series analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:statpp:v:3:y:2012:i:2:p:19:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.