IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/sagmbi/v4y2005i1n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combined Association and Linkage Analysis for General Pedigrees and Genetic Models

Author

Listed:
  • Hössjer Ola

    (University of Stockholm, Sweden)

Abstract

A combined score test for association and linkage analysis is introduced, based on a biologically plausible model with association between markers and causal genes and penetrance between phenotypes and the causal gene. The test is based on a retrospective likelihood of marker data given phenotypes, treating the alleles of the causal gene as hidden data. It is defined for arbitrary outbred pedigrees, a wide class of genetic models including polygenic and shared environmental effects and allows for missing marker data. It is multipoint, taking marker genotypes from several loci into account simultaneously. The score vector has one association and one linkage component, which can be used to define separate tests for association and linkage. For complete marker data, we give closed form expressions for the efficiency of the linkage, association and combined tests. These are examplified for binary and quantitative phenotypes with or without polygenic effects. The conclusion is that association tests are comparatively more efficient than linkage tests for strong association, weak penetrance models, small families and non-extreme phenotypes, whereas the linkage test is more efficient for weak association, strong penetrance models, large families and extreme phenotypes. The combined test is a robust alternative, which never performs much worse than the best of the linkage and association tests, and sometimes significantly better than both of them. It should be particularly useful when little is known about the genetic model.

Suggested Citation

  • Hössjer Ola, 2005. "Combined Association and Linkage Analysis for General Pedigrees and Genetic Models," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 1-42, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:4:y:2005:i:1:n:11
    DOI: 10.2202/1544-6115.1116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1544-6115.1116
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1544-6115.1116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:sagmbi:v:4:y:2005:i:1:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.