IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/rlecon/v19y2023i1p47-84n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Increase in Mortality Rates of African-American Women Following Mandatory Arrest Laws: A Study in Unintended Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Ozel Sinan

    (University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada)

Abstract

From the late 1970s into the 1990s, 20 states in the USA passed’ mandatory arrest laws’, designed to curb domestic violence, by requiring the responding officer to arrest the offender. I show that these laws led to an increase in the mortality rates of African-American women. The increase takes place approximately four years after the law was passed and loses its statistical significance as time passes. I infer from these results that mandatory arrest laws had unintended consequences for the victims whose partners were arrested, but that these unintended consequences impacted the victims only in the few years following the law. I conclude that increased awareness of the law and offender deterrence eventually mitigates these unintended consequences. I propose a potential explanation for the increase in mortality rates, and make a policy recommendation that offenders and victims be informed about the law change if such a change is to be made.

Suggested Citation

  • Ozel Sinan, 2023. "Increase in Mortality Rates of African-American Women Following Mandatory Arrest Laws: A Study in Unintended Effects," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 47-84, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:19:y:2023:i:1:p:47-84:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/rle-2021-0033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0033
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/rle-2021-0033?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:rlecon:v:19:y:2023:i:1:p:47-84:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.