IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pewipo/v20y2019i1p4-13n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Abstimmungen im Bundestag und in der Weimarer Republik: Gewissen oder Strategie?

Author

Listed:
  • Moldovanu Benny

    (Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Institut für Mikroökonomie, Lennéstr. 37, 53113 BonnGermany)

Abstract

In seiner Thünen-Vorlesung vor dem Verein für Socialpolitik im Herbst 2018 hat Benny Moldovanu das Abstimmungsverfahren im Bundestag und in der Weimarer Republik untersucht. Die Analysemethode basiert sowohl auf einer historisch-politischen Evaluation jedes einzelnen Falls als auch auf einer sehr präzisen spieltheoretischen Untersuchung unter Berücksichtigung der neuesten Fortschritte auf den Feldern von Mechanism Design, Social Choice und Informationsökonomie. Eine vergleichsweise einfache Theorie kann schon eine Menge bringen, um die Verwendung bestimmter gesetzgeberischer Verfahren zu erklären und deren Ergebnisse zu beschreiben und vorauszusagen.

Suggested Citation

  • Moldovanu Benny, 2019. "Abstimmungen im Bundestag und in der Weimarer Republik: Gewissen oder Strategie?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 4-13, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pewipo:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:4-13:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/pwp-2019-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2019-0008
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/pwp-2019-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    D02; D03; D71; D72; D82; P48; Abstimmungsverfahren; Agenda; Condorcet-Sieger; aufrichtiges Wahlverhalten; Flaggenkontroverse;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • P48 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Legal Institutions; Property Rights; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Regional Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pewipo:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:4-13:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.