IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pepspp/v25y2019i2p13n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spurred by Threats or Afraid of War? A Survey Experiment on Costs of Conflict in Support for Military Action

Author

Listed:
  • Gleditsch Kristian Skrede

    (University of Essex, Colchester, UK)

  • Tago Atsushi

    (Peace Research Institute Oslo, Oslo, Norway)

  • Tanaka Seiki

    (University of Leeds, Leeds, UK)

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that perceived threats from a rival state will make individuals more likely to “rally-round-the-flag” and support military action. Previous studies have looked at how information about threats affects public support for military action. To date, however, there has been less attention to how information about the costs of conflict affects support for military action in response to threats. In this article, we present a survey experiment designed to evaluate how information about the likely military and economic costs of conflict influences support for military action. We provide Japanese respondents with information about relations with China, and probe how support for military action in the context of the ongoing territorial dispute changes with varying information on the military costs of conflict and its economic consequences. We find that information about trade ties and military capacity exerts a pacifying effect and strengthens opposition to military action. Consistent with our proposed mechanism, we show that greater awareness of military costs is associated with stronger opposition to military action. Our results indicate that even under the existence of external threats, greater awareness of the costs of conflict affects attitudes to military action and can increase support for peaceful solutions to territorial rivalries.

Suggested Citation

  • Gleditsch Kristian Skrede & Tago Atsushi & Tanaka Seiki, 2019. "Spurred by Threats or Afraid of War? A Survey Experiment on Costs of Conflict in Support for Military Action," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 25(2), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:25:y:2019:i:2:p:13:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/peps-2018-0023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2018-0023
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/peps-2018-0023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:25:y:2019:i:2:p:13:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.