IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/pepspp/v22y2016i4p403-412n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Numerical Considerations to Theoretical Solutions: Rational Design of a Debtor Creditor Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Langlois Catherine

    (McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, 37th and O Streets NW, Washington, DC 20057, United States of America)

  • Langlois Jean-Pierre

    (Department of Mathematics, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, United States of America)

Abstract

This paper illustrates how the rational design of an international agreement can be investigated using software and numerical solutions as preliminary steps to a formal modelling of the agreement. The paper examines the repetition of a Called Bluff game interpreted as representing the stylized incentives of a debtor-creditor relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Langlois Catherine & Langlois Jean-Pierre, 2016. "From Numerical Considerations to Theoretical Solutions: Rational Design of a Debtor Creditor Agreement," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 22(4), pages 403-412, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:22:y:2016:i:4:p:403-412:n:2
    DOI: 10.1515/peps-2016-0023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2016-0023
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/peps-2016-0023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:pepspp:v:22:y:2016:i:4:p:403-412:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.