IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ordojb/v58y2007i1p3-16n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Europäische Prüfsteine der Herrschaft und des Rechts / European Touchstones of dominion and Law

Author

Listed:
  • Mestmäcker Ernst-Joachim

Abstract

The European Union, based on a monetary and economic union, calls for new answers to the old question of legitimacy of dominion. Touchstones for its legitimacy are the eco­nomic freedoms that constitute the internal market and the system of undistorted competi­tion. Contrary to a criticism, that is inspired by anti-neo-liberalism, the community’s legal order is no mere superstructure for uncontrolled and uncontrollable economic processes. Its very purpose is to subject governmental and private power positions to the rule of law. The EU proves the important contribution of economic freedoms to social cohesion. It is the political accomplishment of the EU, its Member States and its citizens to integrate so far separate national economies and markets through open markets and free competition. Tins political achievement is possible only in the context of a legal order, the rules of winch and its sanctions in case of infringements are respected. As community institutions and member states alike are bound to common aims including the strict rules of the monetary union, the internal market and the system of competition, tins system can be interpreted as an economic constitution. There are new challenges and even dangers flowing from the new Art. 13 EC Treaty and the policy of anti-discrimination directives.

Suggested Citation

  • Mestmäcker Ernst-Joachim, 2007. "Europäische Prüfsteine der Herrschaft und des Rechts / European Touchstones of dominion and Law," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 58(1), pages 3-16, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:58:y:2007:i:1:p:3-16:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/ordo-2007-0103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ordo-2007-0103
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ordo-2007-0103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Epstein, Richard A., 2003. "Skepticism and Freedom," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226213040, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kurrild-Klitgaard, Peter, 2012. "Frihed mellem fornuft og skepsis [Liberty - between reason and skepticism]," MPRA Paper 43542, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Christmas Billy, 2020. "The Neoliberal Turn: Libertarian Justice and Public Policy," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 26(1), pages 1-031, June.
    3. Nathan Berg & Yuki Watanabe, 2020. "Conservation of behavioral diversity: on nudging, paternalism-induced monoculture, and the social value of heterogeneous beliefs and behavior," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 19(1), pages 103-120, June.
    4. Zwolinski Matt, 2012. "Classical Liberalism and the Basic Income," Basic Income Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Gary Dann & Neil Haddow, 2008. "Just Doing Business or Doing Just Business: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! and the Business of Censoring China’s Internet," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 79(3), pages 219-234, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ordojb:v:58:y:2007:i:1:p:3-16:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.