IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nonpfo/v7y2016i4p435-460n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Work Integration Social Enterprises in the United States: Operating at the Nexus of Public Policy, Markets, and Community

Author

Listed:
  • Cooney Kate

    (School of Management, Yale University, PO Box 208200, New Haven, CT 06520-8200, USA)

Abstract

Work integration social enterprises (WISEs) in the United States represent a market based approach for workforce development and labor market integration that offer employment and training opportunities as well as bridges to the mainstream labor market. Historically developed to create separate spaces of work for populations considered less able to compete in mainstream labor markets, such as people with physical and developmental disabilities, as this article will show, WISEs have evolved to target other disadvantaged and marginalized communities such as individuals suffering from homelessness, youth disconnected from both school and labor markets, formerly incarcerated individuals seeking reentry into employment, and welfare recipients required to work for benefits or as benefits are timed out. This article traces the historic evolution of the WISE sector. The review highlights the ways in which the organizational model has been adapted in response to shifting social constructions about appropriate level of integration and employment norms for disadvantaged groups as well as the changing nature of jobs in the entry level labor market. Further, this paper illustrates that newer (non-disability related) WISE organizational models have different resource generation strategies compared to the older WISE models, may be more exposed to market forces in their social business niches, and must contend with the increased vulnerabilities faced by workers in an era of welfare safety net erosion.

Suggested Citation

  • Cooney Kate, 2016. "Work Integration Social Enterprises in the United States: Operating at the Nexus of Public Policy, Markets, and Community," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 7(4), pages 435-460, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:435-460:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/npf-2016-0009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2016-0009
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/npf-2016-0009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeuli, Kimberly A. & Deller, Steven C., 2007. "Measuring the Local Economic Impact of Cooperatives," Journal of Rural Cooperation, Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research, vol. 35(1), pages 1-17.
    2. Steven Raphael, 2014. "The New Scarlet Letter? Negotiating the U.S. Labor Market with a Criminal Record," Books from Upjohn Press, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research, number nsc, August.
    3. Artz, Georgeanne M. & Kim, Younjun, 2011. "Business Ownership by Workers: Are Worker Cooperatives a Viable Option?," Staff General Research Papers Archive 34575, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Simon Teasdale & Janelle Kerlin & Dennis Young & Jung In Soh, 2013. "Oil and Water Rarely Mix: Exploring the Relative Stability of Nonprofit Revenue Mixes Over Time," Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 69-87, March.
    5. Ted Howard, 2012. "Owning your own job is a beautiful thing: Community wealth building in Cleveland, Ohio," Monograph, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, number 2012oyojiabcwbi.
    6. Sheldon Danziger & Jeffrey Lehman, 1996. "How Will Welfare Recipients Fare in the Labor Market?," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(1), pages 30-35, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bastien Michel & Camille Hémet, 2022. "Custodial versus non-custodial sentences: Long-run evidence from an anticipated reform," PSE Working Papers halshs-03899897, HAL.
    2. Loughrey, Jason & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Meredith, David & Murphy, Ger & Shanahan, Ultan & Miller, Corina, 2018. "The Local Impact of Cattle Farming," 166th Seminar, August 30-31, 2018, Galway, West of Ireland 276231, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Loek Groot & Daan van der Linde, 2017. "The Labor-Managed Firm: Permanent or Start-Up Subsidies?," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 1074-1093, October.
    4. Kevin T. Schnepel, 2018. "Good Jobs and Recidivism," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 128(608), pages 447-469, February.
    5. Berka, Anna L. & Creamer, Emily, 2018. "Taking stock of the local impacts of community owned renewable energy: A review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3400-3419.
    6. Elizabeth A. M. Searing, 2023. "Beyond Donations: Isomorphism and Revenue Mix in Nonprofit Start-Ups," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, March.
    7. Julie Worthington Hartnack & Marykate Zukiewicz & Rayna Thornton, "undated". "Colorado Department of Corrections Reentry Systems Mapping Project: Policy Landscape Summary," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ffcbde96a9344030acebd4137, Mathematica Policy Research.
    8. Jessica Gordon Nembhard, 2014. "Community-Based Asset Building and Community Wealth," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 41(2), pages 101-117, June.
    9. Jaqueline Marcis & Sandro Cesar Bortoluzzi & Edson Pinheiro Lima & Sérgio Eduardo Gouvêa Costa, 2019. "Sustainability performance evaluation of agricultural cooperatives’ operations: a systemic review of the literature," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1111-1126, June.
    10. Jeanne Bellotti & Samina Sattar & Alix Gould-Werth & Jillian Berk & Ivette GHutierrez & Jillian Stein & Hannah Betesh & Lindsay Ochoa & Andrew Wiegand, "undated". "Developing American Job Centers in Jails: Implementation of the Linking to Employment Activities Pre-Release (LEAP) Grants," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 2b892e4cb88249ff8a36774a9, Mathematica Policy Research.
    11. Sandrine STERVINOU & Julie BAYLE-CORDIER & Lorea NARVAIZA & Cristina ARAGON & Cristina ITURRIOZ, 2015. "Worker cooperatives, a status to survive in a changing world or a status to change the world? Spain and France, two worldviews on worker cooperatives," CIRIEC Working Papers 1513, CIRIEC - Université de Liège.
    12. Bruno Grancelli, 2011. "Local development in the rural regions of Eastern Europe: Post-socialist paradoxes of economic and social entrepreneurship," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 16(1), pages 31-53.
    13. Kunal Y. Sevak & LaKami Baker, 2022. "Need‐resource indicators and nonprofit human services organization density," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 129-160, March.
    14. Ariel J. Binder & John Bound, 2019. "The Declining Labor Market Prospects of Less-Educated Men," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 163-190, Spring.
    15. Kevin Schnepel, 2017. "Do post-prison job opportunities reduce recidivism?," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 399-399, November.
    16. Mueller-Smith, Michael & Schnepel, Kevin T., 2016. "Avoiding Convictions: Regression Discontinuity Evidence on Court Deferrals for First-Time Drug Offenders," IZA Discussion Papers 10409, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Linda Murphy & Olive McCarthy & Bridget Carroll, 2017. "No Heir apparent? Exploring the Worker Co-operative Model as a Solution to Family Business Continuity," Journal of Entrepreneurial and Organizational Diversity, European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises, vol. 6(2), pages 20-39.
    18. Marcelo Vieta, 2015. "The Italian Road to Creating Worker Cooperatives from Worker Buyouts: Italy s Worker-Recuperated Enterprises and the Legge Marcora Framework," Euricse Working Papers 1578, Euricse (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises).
    19. Hémet, Camille & Michel, Bastien, 2020. "Incarceration versus probation? Long-run evidence from an anticipated reform," CEPR Discussion Papers 15047, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    20. Benjamin Monnery & Saïd Souam & Anna Montagutelli, 2021. "Economie du travail en prison : enjeux, résultats et recommandations," EconomiX Working Papers 2021-26, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nonpfo:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:435-460:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.