IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/nglost/v5y2011i3p24n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Planetarity" as the Armature for Comparing Alice Walker and Bama Faustina

Author

Listed:
  • Balakrishnan Vinod Valiathakidi

    (National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli)

  • Robinson C.S.

    (SRM University)

Abstract

The paper discusses two writers who belong to distinct cultural spheres: Alice Walker (African American) and Bama Faustina (Dalit). The former is prodigious and versatile. The latter is emerging as a significant voice of protest. The idea of "planetarity" as expounded by Gayatri Spivak in "The Death of a Discipline" is deployed as a theoretical armature that allows for a comparison of two remarkable representatives of their respective cultures who have been articulating and animating the hideous aspects of racism and of caste discrimination. The comparison moreover is an intervention in the continuing conversation in Comparative Literature as to how, in the context of Globalization, borders need to be crossed and the values of the humanities revisited for the survival of the discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Balakrishnan Vinod Valiathakidi & Robinson C.S., 2011. ""Planetarity" as the Armature for Comparing Alice Walker and Bama Faustina," New Global Studies, De Gruyter, vol. 5(3), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:5:y:2011:i:3:p:24:n:2
    DOI: 10.2202/1940-0004.1135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1940-0004.1135
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1940-0004.1135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:nglost:v:5:y:2011:i:3:p:24:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.