IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/lawdev/v16y2023i1p225-250n7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Reform for Secured Transactions Regime with the Doing Business Indicator: A Case of Laos

Author

Listed:
  • Irie Katsunori

    (Japan Federation of Bar Associations, Chiyoda-ku, 100-0013, Japan)

Abstract

The IFC, a member of the World Bank Group, intervened to recommend strongly that Laos adopt a system of computerized registration of secured transactions for movable assets into a new Civil Code. Central to the IFC’s preference for its digital system was the assertion that it would immediately raise Laos’ ranking in the Doing Business indicator prepared by the World Bank Group. A higher ranking would, in turn, significantly increase the amount of inward foreign investment in Laos. This article examines the issues raised by the IFC’s involvement in two categories. The first part focuses on concerns about the substance of the IFC’s interventions, namely the fact that the IFC paid little attention to Lao legal tradition, implementation, and social reality. The second part focuses on the reform process and the fact that the IFC placed undue pressure on the government to adopt its favored approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Irie Katsunori, 2023. "The Reform for Secured Transactions Regime with the Doing Business Indicator: A Case of Laos," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 16(1), pages 225-250, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:225-250:n:7
    DOI: 10.1515/ldr-2022-0105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ldr-2022-0105
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ldr-2022-0105?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:lawdev:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:225-250:n:7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.