IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v5y2008i1p21n11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Longitudinal Evaluation of Food Safety Discussion-Based Exercises: Tool Development and Initial Validation

Author

Listed:
  • Prebles Elizabeth A.

    (Wayne State University)

  • Sayir Aylin D.

    (Karmanos Cancer Institute)

  • Brandenburg Dale C

    (Wayne State University)

  • Mather Edward C.

    (Michigan State University)

Abstract

This study was undertaken for three major purposes: first, to provide initial validation data on an assessment tool designed to provide evidence supporting the following two purposes; second, to analyze the lessons learned process from exercise conduct through subsequent organizational action; and third, to investigate the long-term impact of discussion-based exercises associated with improving food safety preparedness. The major hypothesis forming the basis of the investigation was a logic model containing five sets of variables selected from relevant literature on emergency/disaster preparedness, training evaluation, and instructional design. One variable set, Organizational Actions, served as the criterion of interest. The other four variables served as predictor variables; these were: a) Exercises Outcomes; b) Exercise Design Features; c) Organizational and Personal Characteristics, and d) Demographic Characteristics. The target exercises selected for investigation and evaluation were a class of discussion-based activities conducted for various audiences of food safety personnel from government, industry, public health, and academia. The four exercise sessions from which participants were selected had occurred between two years and six months previously. There were two stages of data collection-personal interviews to assure data relevance and an online survey. Fourteen participants were interviewed and 47 complete responses were obtained from the survey. Data analysis provided considerable support for assessment tool validity. First, it would appear that discussion-based exercises can have some positive long-term impact on organizational change, a finding that heretofore, has not been demonstrated in the relevant research literature. Second, empirical evidence was found for the logic model, with almost 60% of the variance in the criterion variable accounted for by the other measures. Third, given that the exercises were designed to promote coordination and collaboration across agencies and industry sectors, it was found that by tailoring the exercise to participant backgrounds and designing activities to promote long-term learning, the potential for cross-organizational action can be increased. Other conclusions highlighted specific recommendations that could improve exercise design.

Suggested Citation

  • Prebles Elizabeth A. & Sayir Aylin D. & Brandenburg Dale C & Mather Edward C., 2008. "Longitudinal Evaluation of Food Safety Discussion-Based Exercises: Tool Development and Initial Validation," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:21:n:11
    DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1386
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1547-7355.1386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:5:y:2008:i:1:p:21:n:11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.