IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v16y2019i2p5n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond ICS: How Should We Govern Complex Disasters in the United States?

Author

Listed:
  • Nowell Branda

    (School of Public and International Affairs, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA)

  • Steelman Toddi

    (Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA)

Abstract

The complexity of large-scale disasters requires governance structures that can integrate numerous responders quickly under often chaotic conditions. Complex disasters – by definition – span multiple jurisdictions and activate numerous response functions carried out by numerous legally autonomous public, nonprofit, and private actors. The command operating structure of the Incident Command System (ICS) is a hierarchical structure used to manage complex incidents. Increasingly, complex disasters are seen as networks of multiple actors. Improving our capacity to respond to large-scale, complex disasters requires moving beyond the “hierarchy versus networks” debate to understand the conditions under which governance structures can best serve disaster response goals. Understanding the capabilities and limitations of the governance structures embedded in our national policy tools and frameworks can enhance our ability to govern effectively in networked contexts. In this article, we suggest the need to shift focus to build greater capacity for hybrid and network governance approaches, including a more sophisticated understanding of the conditions under which these governance forms are most effective.

Suggested Citation

  • Nowell Branda & Steelman Toddi, 2019. "Beyond ICS: How Should We Govern Complex Disasters in the United States?," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 16(2), pages 1-5, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:5:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2018-0067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2018-0067
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jhsem-2018-0067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ICS; network governance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:16:y:2019:i:2:p:5:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.