IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v12y2015i4p861-873n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioterrorism and Local Agency Preparedness: Results from an Experimental Study in Risk Communication

Author

Listed:
  • Malet David

    (The University of Melbourne – School of Social and Political Sciences, Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia)

  • Korbitz Mark

    (Otero Junior College – Sciences, La Junta, CO, USA)

Abstract

This article examines data collected from a panel of 43 local, state, and Federal emergency response professionals and public officials in Pueblo, Colorado who participated in a 6-month risk communication experiment simulating the remediation of simultaneous bioterrorist attacks involving anthrax and Foot and Mouth Disease. Participant responses to the scenario presented in real-time indicated that local and state government agency personnel with responsibility for public health emergency management are not necessarily familiar with best practices developed from major incidents. Findings also indicate that information related to bioterrorism response should be provided to agencies that do not normally work in public health but that would be involved in responding to a biological agent event.

Suggested Citation

  • Malet David & Korbitz Mark, 2015. "Bioterrorism and Local Agency Preparedness: Results from an Experimental Study in Risk Communication," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 12(4), pages 861-873, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:12:y:2015:i:4:p:861-873:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2014-0107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0107
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0107?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:12:y:2015:i:4:p:861-873:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.