IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/johsem/v12y2015i3p437-467n12.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Network Disaster Response Effectiveness: The Case of ICTs and Hurricane Katrina

Author

Listed:
  • Davis G. Leah

    (University of Illinois – Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Center for Digital Inclusion, 501 E. Daniel Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA)

  • Robbin Alice

    (Department of Information and Library Science, Indiana University – School of Informatics and Computing, 1320 E. 10th Street, LI 023, Bloomington, IN 47405-3907, USA)

Abstract

This article assesses how information and communication technologies (ICTs) hindered the effectiveness of public sector organizational networks in the City of New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. The analysis examines three disaster response networks responsible for disaster planning and preparedness whose primary tasks focused on evacuation, shelter, first response, and public protection. The temporal period under discussion is the immediate days prior to and after Hurricane Katrina made landfall in New Orleans, Friday, August 26, 2005 to Sunday, September 4, 2005. We discuss the status of policies instituted by the federal government, the status of local disaster planning in New Orleans, the theoretical underpinnings and empirical research on communication, ICTs, and the role of organizational networks in public administration, and summarize findings from the small corpus of research on organizational network effectiveness during and after Hurricane Katrina. Our study relies on grounded theory to document how failures of technology, communication, information sharing, and management contributed to reducing organizational network effectiveness and discusses some of the reasons for network failure during the response to Hurricane Katrina. We focus on the need for critical resources and structural conditions that prevented local organizational networks from operating effectively and efficiently. We conclude with an analysis of the continuing relevance of Hurricane Katrina by comparing events that took place following Hurricane Sandy and with series of recommendations for assessing the probability of future disasters including use of a different theoretical framework, social-ecological system thinking; a commitment to and investment in metrics, indicators, and data to measure progress towards resilience; significant investments to harden and redesign key infrastructure; and the adoption of an international perspective to inform national policies and practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Davis G. Leah & Robbin Alice, 2015. "Network Disaster Response Effectiveness: The Case of ICTs and Hurricane Katrina," Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, De Gruyter, vol. 12(3), pages 437-467, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:12:y:2015:i:3:p:437-467:n:12
    DOI: 10.1515/jhsem-2014-0087
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0087
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jhsem-2014-0087?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zayan EL Khaled & Hamid Mcheick, 2019. "Case studies of communications systems during harsh environments: A review of approaches, weaknesses, and limitations to improve quality of service," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(2), pages 15501477198, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:12:y:2015:i:3:p:437-467:n:12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.