IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/jbwige/v50y2009i2p69-80n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Destroyed the Marsh? Oil Field Canals, Coastal Ecology, and the Debate over Louisiana′s Shrinking Wetlands

Author

Listed:
  • Priest Tyler

    (University of Houston, C.T. Bauer College of Business, Houston, TX, U.S.A.)

  • Theriot Jason P.

    (Houston, TX, U.S.A.)

Abstract

This paper examines the environmental history of petroleum pipeline canals and their impact on wetland loss in Coastal Louisiana, and how politics and wetland science have shaped restoration efforts over time. Since the 1930s, Coastal Louisiana′s wetlands have provided America with abundant oil and gas resources. The expansion of this vital energy production and transportation corridor, however, has come with a huge environmental price tag, one that will persist for generations, long after the hydrocarbons are depleted. Louisiana has the world′s seventh largest wetlands and produces the lion share of America′s domestic oil production. Yet Louisiana´s wetlands are disappearing and have been for sometime, along with the habitat, wildlife, culture, and traditional socio-economic activities that is unique to the region. Most of this loss has occurred between the 1950s and late 1970s, the era of intense petroleum production. The reasons for this high loss rate are complex and unique, involving a mixture of both natural and human-induced changes over time. Scientists argue that one of the major causes of this wetland loss has been the long-term direct and indirect impacts of oil-led development, namely the construction of pipeline, access, and navigation canals through the marshes, barrier islands, and bays. The energy and environmental tradeoffs have been particularly challenging given the enormous oil resources produced in the region over the decades and because of the Mississippi Delta′s complex geologic structure. Understanding how the two have interacted over time raises important questions about ecological restoration and the long-term impacts of energy production on fragile landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Priest Tyler & Theriot Jason P., 2009. "Who Destroyed the Marsh? Oil Field Canals, Coastal Ecology, and the Debate over Louisiana′s Shrinking Wetlands," Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook, De Gruyter, vol. 50(2), pages 69-80, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:jbwige:v:50:y:2009:i:2:p:69-80:n:4
    DOI: 10.1524/jbwg.2009.0016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1524/jbwg.2009.0016
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1524/jbwg.2009.0016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:jbwige:v:50:y:2009:i:2:p:69-80:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.