IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v6y2010i1n15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Incidence Rates in Pre-Clinical Studies Using a Williams-Type Procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Hothorn Ludwig A

    (Leibniz University Hannover)

  • Sill Martin

    (German Cancer Research Center)

  • Schaarschmidt Frank

    (Leibniz University Hannover)

Abstract

The analysis of dose-response relationships is a common problem in pre-clinical studies. For example, proportions such as mortality rates and histopathological findings are of particular interest in repeated toxicity studies. Commonly applied designs consist of an untreated control group and several, possibly unequally spaced, dosage groups. The Williams test can be formulated as a multiple contrast test and is a powerful option to evaluate such data. In this paper, we consider simultaneous inference for Williams-type multiple contrasts when the response variable is binomial and sample sizes are only moderate. Approximate simultaneous confidence limits can be constructed using the quantiles of a multivariate normal distribution taking the correlation into account. Alternatively, multiplicity-adjusted p-values can be calculated as well. A simulation study shows that a simple correction based on adding pseudo observations leads to acceptable performance for moderate sample sizes, such as 40 per group. In addition, the calculation of adjusted p-values and approximate power is presented. Finally, the proposed methods are applied to example data from two toxicological studies; the methods are available in an R-package.

Suggested Citation

  • Hothorn Ludwig A & Sill Martin & Schaarschmidt Frank, 2010. "Evaluation of Incidence Rates in Pre-Clinical Studies Using a Williams-Type Procedure," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:6:y:2010:i:1:n:15
    DOI: 10.2202/1557-4679.1180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2202/1557-4679.1180
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2202/1557-4679.1180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bretz, Frank, 2006. "An extension of the Williams trend test to general unbalanced linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(7), pages 1735-1748, April.
    2. Eryl Shirley, 2007. "Tests for a simple tree order restriction with application to dose–response studies," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 56(4), pages 493-494, August.
    3. Price, Robert M. & Bonett, Douglas G., 2004. "An improved confidence interval for a linear function of binomial proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 449-456, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hasler Mario, 2013. "Multiple Contrasts for Repeated Measures," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Philip Pallmann & Ludwig Hothorn & Gemechis Djira, 2014. "A Levene-type test of homogeneity of variances against ordered alternatives," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1593-1608, December.
    3. M. Álvarez Hernández & A. Martín Andrés & I. Herranz Tejedor, 2016. "One-sided asymptotic inferences for a proportion," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(9), pages 1738-1752, July.
    4. Kitsche, A. & Hothorn, L.A. & Schaarschmidt, F., 2012. "The use of historical controls in estimating simultaneous confidence intervals for comparisons against a concurrent control," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(12), pages 3865-3875.
    5. Mondal, Anjana & Sattler, Paavo & Kumar, Somesh, 2023. "Testing against ordered alternatives in a two-way model without interaction under heteroscedasticity," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    6. Philip Pallmann & Ludwig A. Hothorn, 2016. "Analysis of means: a generalized approach using R," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 1541-1560, June.
    7. Mario Hasler, 2016. "Heteroscedasticity: multiple degrees of freedom vs. sandwich estimation," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 55-68, March.
    8. José Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes & Tulsi Sagar Sheth & José Fernando Vera-Vera, 2024. "Hypothesis Test to Compare Two Paired Binomial Proportions: Assessment of 24 Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    9. Douglas G. Bonett & Robert M. Price, 2012. "Adjusted Wald Confidence Interval for a Difference of Binomial Proportions Based on Paired Data," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 37(4), pages 479-488, August.
    10. Hasler Mario & Hothorn Ludwig A, 2011. "A Dunnett-Type Procedure for Multiple Endpoints," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, January.
    11. A. Martín Andrés & M. Álvarez Hernández, 2015. "Simultaneous inferences: new method of maximum combination," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 1099-1113, November.
    12. Konietschke, Frank & Placzek, Marius & Schaarschmidt, Frank & Hothorn, Ludwig A., 2015. "nparcomp: An R Software Package for Nonparametric Multiple Comparisons and Simultaneous Confidence Intervals," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 64(i09).
    13. Zou, Guang Yong & Huang, Wenyi & Zhang, Xiaohe, 2009. "A note on confidence interval estimation for a linear function of binomial proportions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1080-1085, February.
    14. Bogomolov, Marina & Davidov, Ori, 2019. "Order restricted univariate and multivariate inference with adjustment for covariates in partially linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 20-27.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:6:y:2010:i:1:n:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.