IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v19y2023i2p439-453n3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Error analysis of the PacBio sequencing CCS reads

Author

Listed:
  • Pourmohammadi Reza
  • Abouei Jamshid

    (WINEL Research Laboratory at the Department of Electrical Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran)

  • Anpalagan Alagan

    (Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada)

Abstract

Third generation sequencing technologies such as Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore provide faster, cost-effective and simpler assembly process generating longer reads than the ones in the next generation sequencing. However, the error rates of these long reads are higher than those of the short reads, resulting in an error correcting process before the assembly such as using the Circular Consensus Sequencing (CCS) reads in PacBio sequencing machines. In this paper, we propose a probabilistic model for the error occurrence along the CCS reads. We obtain the error probability of any arbitrary nucleotide as well as the base calling Phred quality score of the nucleotides along the CCS reads in terms of the number of sub-reads. Furthermore, we derive the error rate distribution of the reads in relation to the pass number. It follows the binomial distribution which can be approximated by the normal distribution for long reads. Finally, we evaluate our proposed model by comparing it with three real PacBio datasets, namely, Lambda, and E. coli genomes, and Alzheimer’s disease targeted experiment.

Suggested Citation

  • Pourmohammadi Reza & Abouei Jamshid & Anpalagan Alagan, 2023. "Error analysis of the PacBio sequencing CCS reads," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 19(2), pages 439-453, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:19:y:2023:i:2:p:439-453:n:3
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2021-0091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2021-0091
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2021-0091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:19:y:2023:i:2:p:439-453:n:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.