IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v18y2022i1p57-72n17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian mixture model for changepoint estimation using ordinal predictors

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts Emily
  • Zhao Lili

    (Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, 48109, Ann Arbor, MI, USA)

Abstract

In regression models, predictor variables with inherent ordering, such ECOG performance status or novel biomarker expression levels, are commonly seen in medical settings. Statistically, it may be difficult to determine the functional form of an ordinal predictor variable. Often, such a variable is dichotomized based on whether it is above or below a certain cutoff. Other methods conveniently treat the ordinal predictor as a continuous variable and assume a linear relationship with the outcome. However, arbitrarily choosing a method may lead to inaccurate inference and treatment. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian mixture model to consider both dichotomous and linear forms for the variable. This allows for simultaneous assessment of the appropriate form of the predictor in regression models by considering the presence of a changepoint through the lens of a threshold detection problem. This method is applicable to continuous, binary, and survival outcomes, and it is easily amenable to penalized regression. We evaluated the proposed method using simulation studies and apply it to two real datasets. We provide JAGS code for easy implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts Emily & Zhao Lili, 2022. "A Bayesian mixture model for changepoint estimation using ordinal predictors," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 57-72, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:18:y:2022:i:1:p:57-72:n:17
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2020-0151
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2020-0151
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2020-0151?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:18:y:2022:i:1:p:57-72:n:17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.