IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/ijbist/v12y2016i2p13n10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-locus Test and Correction for Confounding Effects in Genome-Wide Association Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Chen Donglai
  • Liu Chuanhai
  • Xie Jun

    (Department of Statistics, Purdue University, 250 N. University Street West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) examine a large number of genetic variants, e. g., single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), and associate them with a disease of interest. Traditional statistical methods for GWASs can produce spurious associations, due to limited information from individual SNPs and confounding effects. This paper develops two statistical methods to enhance data analysis of GWASs. The first is a multiple-SNP association test, which is a weighted chi-square test derived for big contingency tables. The test assesses combinatorial effects of multiple SNPs and improves conventional methods of single SNP analysis. The second is a method that corrects for confounding effects, which may come from population stratification as well as other ambiguous (unknown) factors. The proposed method identifies a latent confounding factor, using a profile of whole genome SNPs, and eliminates confounding effects through matching or stratified statistical analysis. Simulations and a GWAS of rheumatoid arthritis demonstrate that the proposed methods dramatically remove the number of significant tests, or false positives, and outperforms other available methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen Donglai & Liu Chuanhai & Xie Jun, 2016. "Multi-locus Test and Correction for Confounding Effects in Genome-Wide Association Studies," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:12:y:2016:i:2:p:13:n:10
    DOI: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ijb-2015-0091
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ijb-2015-0091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:ijbist:v:12:y:2016:i:2:p:13:n:10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.