IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/evoice/v18y2021i1p67-80n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eurobonds: Three Lessons from China’s “Debt Centralization/Decentralization” Experience

Author

Listed:
  • An Zhiyong

    (Fiscal Affairs Department, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, 20431, USA)

Abstract

Eurobonds, dubbed as Coronabonds in the context of the current coronavirus crisis, are being hotly debated among the euro area member states amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The debate is in many ways a retread of the euro area sovereign debt crisis of 2011–2012. As China’s “debt centralization/decentralization” experience is comparable with the introduction of Eurobonds in the European Union (EU) in terms of institutional mechanism design, we review our previous series of studies of China’s “debt centralization/decentralization” experience to shed some light on the Eurobonds debate. We obtain three key lessons. First, the introduction of Eurobonds in EU is likely to soften the budget constraint of the governments of the euro area member states. Second, it is also likely to strengthen the moral hazard incentives of the governments of the euro area member states to intentionally overstate their budget problems. Finally, the magnitudes of the moral hazard effects generated by the introduction of Eurobonds in EU are likely larger than their respective counterparts in China.

Suggested Citation

  • An Zhiyong, 2021. "Eurobonds: Three Lessons from China’s “Debt Centralization/Decentralization” Experience," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 67-80, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:18:y:2021:i:1:p:67-80:n:8
    DOI: 10.1515/ev-2020-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2020-0020
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ev-2020-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    COVID-19 pandemic; Coronabonds; Eurobonds;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G - Financial Economics
    • H - Public Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:evoice:v:18:y:2021:i:1:p:67-80:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.