IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/eucflr/v4y2007i1p126-166n9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross Border Negotiated Deals: Why Culture Matters?

Author

Listed:
  • King Christopher

    (King is Vice President and General Counsel of Hunter Douglas NV. King is admitted as an Attorney-at-law in New York, is on the Roll as Solicitor if the Supreme Court of England and Wales, is a Rechtsanwalt in Germany and is a European Lawyer in Switzerland.)

  • Segain Hubert

    (Segain is an Attorney with Herbert Smith LLP. Segain is admitted as an Attorney-at-law in New York and is an Avocat à la Cour in France.)

Abstract

Different negotiation styles in the negotiation of complex contracts observed in different cultures reflect both different allocations of responsibility within organizations as well as the degree of trust in the business relationship. Complexity of documentation associates with a low degree of trust and a desire for rent-seeking by the draftsmen. There appear to be inherent inefficiencies that prevent a simpler approach, although such an approach would result in a net benefit both in transaction costs and certainty of execution. Neither the “Harvard” approach to negotiations, nor a low context approach to communication characteristic of some very successful business cultures (e.g. USA or Germany) is universally accepted. Accordingly, however well they (demonstrably) work in a national context, the high-context approaches to negotiation (e.g. Japan or to a lesser extent England) can create risks to a transaction with parties who do not share the same context.

Suggested Citation

  • King Christopher & Segain Hubert, 2007. "Cross Border Negotiated Deals: Why Culture Matters?," European Company and Financial Law Review, De Gruyter, vol. 4(1), pages 126-166, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:4:y:2007:i:1:p:126-166:n:9
    DOI: 10.1515/ECFR.2007.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/ECFR.2007.009
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/ECFR.2007.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:4:y:2007:i:1:p:126-166:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.