IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v9y2021i1p285-301n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Causal versions of maximum entropy and principle of insufficient reason

Author

Listed:
  • Janzing Dominik

    (Causality Team, Amazon Research, Tübingen, Germany)

Abstract

The principle of insufficient reason (PIR) assigns equal probabilities to each alternative of a random experiment whenever there is no reason to prefer one over the other. The maximum entropy principle (MaxEnt) generalizes PIR to the case where statistical information like expectations are given. It is known that both principles result in paradoxical probability updates for joint distributions of cause and effect. This is because constraints on the conditional P(effect∣cause)P\left({\rm{effect}}| {\rm{cause}}) result in changes of P(cause)P\left({\rm{cause}}) that assign higher probability to those values of the cause that offer more options for the effect, suggesting “intentional behavior.” Earlier work therefore suggested sequentially maximizing (conditional) entropy according to the causal order, but without further justification apart from plausibility on toy examples. We justify causal modifications of PIR and MaxEnt by separating constraints into restrictions for the cause and restrictions for the mechanism that generates the effect from the cause. We further sketch why causal PIR also entails “Information Geometric Causal Inference.” We briefly discuss problems of generalizing the causal version of MaxEnt to arbitrary causal DAGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Janzing Dominik, 2021. "Causal versions of maximum entropy and principle of insufficient reason," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 285-301, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:285-301:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2021-0022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0022
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2021-0022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:285-301:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.