IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bpj/causin/v11y2023i1p18n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attributable fraction and related measures: Conceptual relations in the counterfactual framework

Author

Listed:
  • Suzuki Etsuji

    (Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan)

  • Yamamoto Eiji

    (Okayama University of Science, Okayama 700-0005, Japan)

Abstract

The attributable fraction (population) has attracted much attention from a theoretical perspective and has been used extensively to assess the impact of potential health interventions. However, despite its extensive use, there is much confusion about its concept and calculation methods. In this article, we discuss the concepts of and calculation methods for the attributable fraction and related measures in the counterfactual framework, both with and without stratification by covariates. Generally, the attributable fraction is useful when the exposure of interest has a causal effect on the outcome. However, it is important to understand that this statement applies to the exposed group. Although the target population of the attributable fraction (population) is the total population, the causal effect should be present not in the total population but in the exposed group. As related measures, we discuss the preventable fraction and prevented fraction, which are generally useful when the exposure of interest has a preventive effect on the outcome, and we further propose a new measure called the attributed fraction. We also discuss the causal and preventive excess fractions, and provide notes on vaccine efficacy. Finally, we discuss the relations between the aforementioned six measures and six possible patterns using a conceptual schema.

Suggested Citation

  • Suzuki Etsuji & Yamamoto Eiji, 2023. "Attributable fraction and related measures: Conceptual relations in the counterfactual framework," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:18:n:1
    DOI: 10.1515/jci-2021-0068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0068
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jci-2021-0068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:causin:v:11:y:2023:i:1:p:18:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.