IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/reveco/vsupplementy2012i2p310-316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Actions, Methods And Tools For The Quality Evaluation Of Educational Services - A Comparative Approach

Author

Listed:
  • ROMAN Teodora
  • MAXIM Emil
  • MANOLICA Adriana

Abstract

A specific characteristic of the academic education is particularly the multitude of stakeholders types (students, employers, the community and parents, alumni, members of the education bodies, government bodies, auditors and assessors, users of research). This fact triggers the need of a high level of flexibility in order to meet the diversity of the needs and expectations shown by the categories involved. Since perpetual modifications take place at the level of all these elements and at the level of the workforce market, a continuous research and analysis of the changes is necessary, so that the educational content is permanently adapted to the external and internal reality. Therefore, several universities in Romania were subject to study, in order to identify the internal assessment procedures used. The current study does not intend to offer positive or negative examples, but rather a comparative analysis of the internal assessment procedures identified in the public information made available by the education bodies.

Suggested Citation

  • ROMAN Teodora & MAXIM Emil & MANOLICA Adriana, 2012. "Actions, Methods And Tools For The Quality Evaluation Of Educational Services - A Comparative Approach," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 310-316.
  • Handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:supplement:y:2012:i:2:p:310-316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/suplimente/Volume2-2012.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:supplement:y:2012:i:2:p:310-316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard Alexandru Stoica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.