IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/reveco/v70y2018i3p46-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Udemy: A Case Study In Online Education And Training

Author

Listed:
  • CETINA Iuliana

    (The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania)

  • GOLDBACH Dumitru

    (Valahia University of Targoviste, Targoviste, Romania)

  • MANEA Natalia

    (University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to present a comparative analysis between the Udemy platform and the most important online learning platforms in the World. The Internet and technology have made important changes in traditional education, by creating digital libraries, multifunctional desktops, distributing information through the electronic post, and also introducing a new type of education, called e-learning or online learning. The main advantages of this new paradigm of education are: easy access to information, flexibility, convenience, time saving, multitasking, connectivity, different approaches, etc. Udemy, the online education and training platform, is one of the largest platforms in the World.

Suggested Citation

  • CETINA Iuliana & GOLDBACH Dumitru & MANEA Natalia, 2018. "Udemy: A Case Study In Online Education And Training," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 70(3), pages 46-54, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:70:y:2018:i:3:p:46-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://economice.ulbsibiu.ro/revista.economica/archive/70304cetina&goldbach&manea.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    education; online; training; internet;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:reveco:v:70:y:2018:i:3:p:46-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard Alexandru Stoica (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.