IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/blg/journl/v5y2010i3p79-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing The Hypothesis Of An Efficient Market In Terms Of Information – The Case Of The Capital Market In Romania During Recession

Author

Listed:
  • Vasile Radu Bratian

    (Lucian Blaga Unversity of Sibiu)

  • Claudiu Ilie Opreana

    (Lucian Blaga Unversity of Sibiu)

Abstract

This paper is trying to test the hypothesis of efficient market (EMH Efficient Market Hypothesis), the case of capital market in Romania during the economic financial crisis. According to the purpose in view our research is aiming at testing the hypothesis of random walk of stock exchange indexes BET, BET-C, BET_FI of Bucharest Stock Exchange. In this respect we will enforce statistic tests to see if the capital market in Romania is efficient in a weak form during this period.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasile Radu Bratian & Claudiu Ilie Opreana, 2010. "Testing The Hypothesis Of An Efficient Market In Terms Of Information – The Case Of The Capital Market In Romania During Recession," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 5(3), pages 79-106, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:3:p:79-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://eccsf.ulbsibiu.ro/RePEc/blg/journl/533bratian&opreana.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Camelia Oprean, 2012. "Testing the financial market informational efficiency in emerging states," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 4(2), pages 181-190, Decembre.
    2. BRATIAN Vasile & BUCUR Amelia, 2017. "The Development And The Current Status Of The Capital Market Hypotheses: A Few Benchmarks," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 69(1), pages 22-28, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:blg:journl:v:5:y:2010:i:3:p:79-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mihaela Herciu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feulbro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.