IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/worlde/v46y2023i9p2707-2731.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Matrix completion of world trade: An analysis of interpretability through Shapley values

Author

Listed:
  • Giorgio Gnecco
  • Federico Nutarelli
  • Massimo Riccaboni

Abstract

Economic complexity and machine learning have recently become popular approaches for analysing international trade. However, for effective use of machine learning in relation to economic complexity and policymaking, it is important to understand what are the key features for predictions. In this framework, this article addresses the issue of the interpretability of results obtained with a machine learning technique—namely, matrix completion—when applied to economic complexity, specifically in predicting revealed comparative advantages (RCAs) of countries in different product categories. Shapley values are used to measure the role each country plays in predicting the RCAs of other countries. Countries relevant for prediction may differ from countries whose RCA values are similar to those of the country of interest when a standard similarity measure such as cosine similarity is used. We demonstrate the usefulness of our approach to identifying comparable countries by focussing our analysis on export diversification into complex goods of selected European countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Giorgio Gnecco & Federico Nutarelli & Massimo Riccaboni, 2023. "Matrix completion of world trade: An analysis of interpretability through Shapley values," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(9), pages 2707-2731, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:46:y:2023:i:9:p:2707-2731
    DOI: 10.1111/twec.13457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13457
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/twec.13457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:46:y:2023:i:9:p:2707-2731. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0378-5920 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.