IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/worlde/v41y2018i5p1251-1268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do countries respond to anti†dumping filings? Dispute settlement and retaliatory anti†dumping

Author

Listed:
  • Robert M. Feinberg
  • Kara M. Reynolds

Abstract

Empirical studies have found that countries may respond strategically to the anti†dumping petition filed against their exporters through their own retaliatory actions. Although most previous studies have focused on retaliatory anti†dumping filings, in this paper we explore another potential avenue for strategic response—filing a complaint under the World Trade Organization's (WTO) dispute settlement understanding. Using a panel of global anti†dumping filings between 1995 and 2011, we analyse under what conditions countries will choose to retaliate through either an anti†dumping petition or a WTO dispute, and to what degree these two strategies are complementary or act as substitutes. We find statistical evidence that countries are more likely to file a WTO dispute when they have also filed a retaliatory anti†dumping petition, suggesting that these two strategies may be complementary.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert M. Feinberg & Kara M. Reynolds, 2018. "How do countries respond to anti†dumping filings? Dispute settlement and retaliatory anti†dumping," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 1251-1268, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:41:y:2018:i:5:p:1251-1268
    DOI: 10.1111/twec.12601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12601
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/twec.12601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Neha B. Upadhayay, 2020. "Are only men fighting trade wars? Empirical evidence from the Temporary Trade Barriers (TTB) data," Erudite Working Paper 2020-03, Erudite.
    2. Neha Bhardwaj Upadhayay, 2020. "Uncovering the proliferation of contingent protection through channels of retaliation, gender and development assistance," Erudite Ph.D Dissertations, Erudite, number ph20-02 edited by Julie Lochard & Catherine Bros, February.
    3. Kara Reynolds & Tatiana Yanguas, 2018. "China – Cellulose Pulp: China’s Quest to Satisfy WTO Panels and the Appellate Body," RSCAS Working Papers 2018/59, European University Institute.
    4. Alberto Gallegos David, 2019. "Optimal Reciprocal Dumping in a Managed Trade Regime," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 14(2), pages 189-202, Abril-Jun.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:worlde:v:41:y:2018:i:5:p:1251-1268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0378-5920 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.