IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/tvecsg/v98y2007i4p519-525.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Flood Risk, Uncertainty And Changing River Protection Policy In The Netherlands: The Case Of ‘Calamity Polders’

Author

Listed:
  • DIK ROTH
  • JEROEN WARNER

Abstract

Extreme river discharges, floods and debates about climate change triggered a shift in flood protection policy in the Netherlands from infrastructural to spatial measures. The new policy directive of ‘Room for the River’, details of which were introduced in 2000, should prepare the country for future peak discharges. In order to deal with ‘residual risk’, the concept of ‘calamity polders’ for ‘controlled flooding’ was launched in the same year. In this contribution we discuss the local protests against these plans against the backdrop of changed thinking about flood protection. We analyse the emergence of the concept, the commission established to inquire into the calamity polder plans, as well as local resistance and the counter‐expertise it mobilised. We conclude that the choice to limit public participation in the debates about calamity polders has backfired. It has contributed to the shelving of the plans while increasing public distrust of flood policy. At the same time this episode has created some awareness among policy‐makers of the importance of dialogue with the inhabitants of areas affected by flood policy measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Dik Roth & Jeroen Warner, 2007. "Flood Risk, Uncertainty And Changing River Protection Policy In The Netherlands: The Case Of ‘Calamity Polders’," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 98(4), pages 519-525, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:98:y:2007:i:4:p:519-525
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00419.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00419.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-9663.2007.00419.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arjen Zegwaard & Arthur Petersen & Philippus Wester, 2015. "Climate change and ontological politics in the Dutch Delta," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 433-444, October.
    2. Arwin van Buuren & Jeroen Warner, 2014. "From Bypass to Bathtub: Backfiring Policy Labels in Dutch Water Governance," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(6), pages 1000-1016, December.
    3. C. Dieperink & D. L. T Hegger & M. H. N. Bakker & Z. W. Kundzewicz & C. Green & P. P. J. Driessen, 2016. "Recurrent Governance Challenges in the Implementation and Alignment of Flood Risk Management Strategies: a Review," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(13), pages 4467-4481, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:tvecsg:v:98:y:2007:i:4:p:519-525. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0040-747X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.