IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v21y2000i12p1195-1214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do strategic groups differ in reputation?

Author

Listed:
  • Tamela D. Ferguson
  • David L. Deephouse
  • William L. Ferguson

Abstract

While most strategic group research has focused on performance implications, we consider the relationship between strategic group membership and reputation. Using strategic group identity and domain consensus concepts, we propose strategic groups have different reputations. We find significant differences exist in reputation across three identified strategic groups of U.S. property/casualty insurers, supporting our contention that reputation is a multilevel concept. Post hoc analyses suggest strategic groups with higher reputation also have higher performance on some critical measures, indicating reputation may be a mobility barrier beneficial to members of certain groups. Practitioner implications include challenges of within‐group differentiation in firm reputation. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamela D. Ferguson & David L. Deephouse & William L. Ferguson, 2000. "Do strategic groups differ in reputation?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(12), pages 1195-1214, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:21:y:2000:i:12:p:1195-1214
    DOI: 10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:123.0.CO;2-R
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:123.0.CO;2-R
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1097-0266(200012)21:123.0.CO;2-R?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:21:y:2000:i:12:p:1195-1214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.