IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/stratm/v21y2000i10-11p981-996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Satisficing Principle in Capability Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Sidney G. Winter

Abstract

Whether an organization has a certain capability is often a matter of degree. Thus, in the context of initial learning of a capability, there is generally no clear‐cut or automatic answer to the question of when an organization should be expected to cut back its learning efforts and affirm that the desired capability has been achieved. This paper offers a simple conceptual model for this question, based on the satisficing principle. More specifically, the question addressed is: ‘When does overt learning stop?’—where ‘overt’ learning is understood as being marked by observable allocation of attention and resources to the task of acquiring the capability. The model provides the framework for a discussion of various influences on the aspiration level in the satisficing model, and hence on the nature of the capability that has been achieved when learning stops. Overt learning efforts may be resumed at some time later if external factors operate to lift aspiration levels relevant to the capability. The paper discusses how such ‘re‐ignition’ of learning may occur as a result of an organizational crisis, or of the institution of a quality management program. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Sidney G. Winter, 2000. "The Satisficing Principle in Capability Learning," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 981-996, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:21:y:2000:i:10-11:p:981-996
    DOI: 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/113.0.CO;2-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/113.0.CO;2-4
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/113.0.CO;2-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:stratm:v:21:y:2000:i:10-11:p:981-996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/0143-2095 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.